DoseMeHomie
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2010
- Messages
- 73
Does anyone know the results? Is this chemical carcinogenic or toxic in any way?
People also understand that nicotine, polonium-210, lead-210, etc. are carcinogenic as well. They understand not only that it causes cancer, but they specifically understand how it interacts with DNA to cause the genotoxicity.
So far the only published research on JWH-018 has shown it to not have this kind of genotoxic property. Other JWH-* of the series like JWH-015 and JWH-133 on the other hand have research explaining a mechanism of action for their causing the PREVENTION of cancer.
Nicotine has been shown to be genotoxic on its own.
http://toxsci.oxfordjournals.org/content/86/2/309.full for just one example out of dozens or hundreds.
The lack of higher DNA damage in smokers compared to nonsmokers could be a question of nicotine dose, rapid DNA repair, or interactions with other smoke constituents. These results require further investigations on the contribution of nicotine to tobacco carcinogenesis.
I'm just talking about the mechanism of action being known I guess. There's no proposed mechanism of action with JWH-018 that would cause it to interfere with DNA replication.
Well, of course it effects the nervous system. It's a full agonist at CB1 and CB2 receptors, and probably has effects on many other receptors like the trace amine receptor, GPR55, TRPV1, etc. It indirectly modulates GABA transmission and the opioid system via the CB1 agonism in the brain.
It causes receptor downregulation and development of tolerance/addiction to an even worse degree than THC can also.