Lol, no, I wish - I'm "shooting" for focalin or dexedrine next doc visit. FocalSlang was my nick on an MMO called Shaiya - it helped me beat my cocaine IV addiction - fingers moving, talking to people. Of course I got addicted to the darn game -- 17 hour sessions, not to mention when I'd treat meoldveins to some yay yay.
I have had an amazing experience slamming Adderall XR. I know. "judge not" - about 90mg's, in a spoon with water, crush with another spoon, keep going at it, maybe a bit of heat to make the crushing easier - then I drew up, squirt in a clean spoon, drew again, yet the liquid was grey and
not see-through . I knew it was a bad bad idea, but I have been off H for 5 months and just got back from the first time I allowed myself to go to a bar in this two-horse town. To sum it up, I was lucky not to miss, a miss would have been a disaster, but the physical rush was amazing, I could compare it to really high quality C and a sprinkle of opiate to mellow it out (my favorite way to shoot C

.
I do not know why it worked so well, but never tried again, i mean, talk about muddy water, this was concrete juice!
As far as IV Addy IR goes - my experience ends with the 3cc stuffed with cotton, and powdered pills dissolved in hot water with salt and citric acid (Vit. C). Today's such endeavor, of 80 mg, produced very negligible results, as far as euphoria goes (that's one thing that XR was - euphoric - ever heard of a guy busting a nut after a shot of meth? Well I didn't and never shot meth, but EUphORIC).
Now, browsing the internet today, I found an interesting article, a patent of sorts, which, in its summary sugests adding a certain water-soluble polymer to Adderall, and possibly other medicines, which would counteract the euphoria, while enhancing the jittery speediness. Let me see if I can find the link to the study. This would explain why Corr pink tablets have such crappy effects now. I remember fall of 2008 - running even a quarter or half of one of those 30's (gf's) had me feeling amazing.
okay, here's the link, there's even a timeline, it all makes sense now!
http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20080207757
listen to this:
actually, don't, this one says it all:
[0152]
For one or more of the recited methods of the present technology, the following properties may be achieved through conjugating amphetamine to a polar hydrophilic group. In one embodiment, the cardiovascular toxicity or stress of the polar hydrophilic prodrug of amphetamine of the present technology may be lower than that of the amphetamine when the amphetamine is delivered in its unconjugated state, as a compound conjugated to a standard amino acid, or as a salt thereof. In another embodiment, the possibility of behavioral deterioration is reduced or eliminated. In another embodiment, the possibility of abuse by intranasal administration is reduced or eliminated. In another embodiment, the possibility of abuse by intravenous administration is reduced or eliminated
Read more:
http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20080207757#ixzz0mNEFbZ4J
[0149]For one or more of the recited methods, the composition of the present technology used may yield a therapeutic effect without substantial euphoria. Preferably, the stimulant composition of the present technology can provide a therapeutically equivalent AUC when compared to the stimulant alone but does not provide a Climax which results in euphoria or an equivalent Cmax.
Another embodiment of the present technology is a method for reducing or preventing the euphoric effect of a stimulant, comprising consuming a composition comprising at least one polar, hydrophilic stimulant prodrug of the present technology that can decrease the pharmacological activity of the stimulant when the composition is used in a manner inconsistent with the manufacturer's instructions.
Read more:
http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20080207757#ixzz0mNDZJKrd
Read more:
http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20080207757#ixzz0mNCvszEY