why do ppl keep laying into this shitty reasoning as though it's a slam dunk?
firstly, even if GENOCIDE was the question: according to international law, that point would be moot.
and since the topic is the current ethnic cleansing of gaza, that point is even more moot.
is this an argument in support of war crimes? or what was your point with this? please go slow, apparently i'm not so smart cause i don't get what history has to do with whether or not israel is guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity.