Eisbaer
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Messages
- 73
According to this study, getting drunk in mid-adolescence seems to reduce anxiety and also depression in individuals later in life, and improve the transition from adolescence into adulthood for males. Does anyone know of any other scientific evidence proving the study below to being correct or incorrect?
"Males who remained abstainers in adulthood were psychologically well-adjusted, but both male late beginners and males who remained abstainers showed a delayed entry into the adult role. Thus, getting drunk for the first time in mid-adolescence seems to be an ingredient in the normal developmental process in adolescent males."
"It has also been found that drinking in mid-adolescence is related to improved mental health in the long term (15). According to Silbereisen & Noack (13), alcohol use appears to facilitate integration into the peer group, which in turn may be responsible for a subsequent gain in self-esteem. "
"Mental health problems. In males, both late and early beginners had higher scores on the SCL-index than the abstainers and those whose debut age was close to the mean. Pair-wise comparisons (Scheffé test) revealed that males who were younger than 15 or older than 18 years of age at first intoxication, reported significantly more symptoms of anxiety and depression than the other males did. In females, the early beginners deviated from those had followed the mainstream, but the late beginners did not. There was a U-shaped association between age at first intoxication and the BCI-index in males, implying that the abstainers, as well as the early and late beginners, had poorer self-esteem than those in the middle range. Again, significant distinctions (Scheffé test) were found among males: The abstainers and those whose debut age was 14 or younger and 17 or older had poorer self-esteem than those who were 15 or 16 years old at their first intoxication. Age at first intoxication was unrelated to the BCI-index in females."
"An association between age at first intoxication and living with parents emerged when the respondents were 25 to 28 years old, but only in males. Thus, disproportionally many male abstainers and male late beginners continued to live with their parents in adulthood."
The study also says that..
"There were striking differences, however, between abstainers and late beginners"
However, it doesn't seem to mention any of the differences. Are there any differences between abstainers and late beginners?
Below is a link to the study. My quotes are from the "DRY adolescence 1996.doc" document which is available for download.
https://www.researchgate.net/public...psychosocial_maladjustment_in_young_adulthood
"Males who remained abstainers in adulthood were psychologically well-adjusted, but both male late beginners and males who remained abstainers showed a delayed entry into the adult role. Thus, getting drunk for the first time in mid-adolescence seems to be an ingredient in the normal developmental process in adolescent males."
"It has also been found that drinking in mid-adolescence is related to improved mental health in the long term (15). According to Silbereisen & Noack (13), alcohol use appears to facilitate integration into the peer group, which in turn may be responsible for a subsequent gain in self-esteem. "
"Mental health problems. In males, both late and early beginners had higher scores on the SCL-index than the abstainers and those whose debut age was close to the mean. Pair-wise comparisons (Scheffé test) revealed that males who were younger than 15 or older than 18 years of age at first intoxication, reported significantly more symptoms of anxiety and depression than the other males did. In females, the early beginners deviated from those had followed the mainstream, but the late beginners did not. There was a U-shaped association between age at first intoxication and the BCI-index in males, implying that the abstainers, as well as the early and late beginners, had poorer self-esteem than those in the middle range. Again, significant distinctions (Scheffé test) were found among males: The abstainers and those whose debut age was 14 or younger and 17 or older had poorer self-esteem than those who were 15 or 16 years old at their first intoxication. Age at first intoxication was unrelated to the BCI-index in females."
"An association between age at first intoxication and living with parents emerged when the respondents were 25 to 28 years old, but only in males. Thus, disproportionally many male abstainers and male late beginners continued to live with their parents in adulthood."
The study also says that..
"There were striking differences, however, between abstainers and late beginners"
However, it doesn't seem to mention any of the differences. Are there any differences between abstainers and late beginners?
Below is a link to the study. My quotes are from the "DRY adolescence 1996.doc" document which is available for download.
https://www.researchgate.net/public...psychosocial_maladjustment_in_young_adulthood
