college_dropout
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2005
- Messages
- 2,170
No, it's called logic and reasoning. You made up some truly stupid shit that you pretended I was arguing to make it easier for you to dodge the fucking point. But okay, let's deconstruct it then shall we?absolute bollocks! and just what i expected, the "straw man"... its just another cheap "out" that the gays use when there flimsy baseless argument ends.
Where did I state or imply that? Gay people are human beings just like everyone else. You have your decent, kind and generous ones, to those who are anti-social, unpleasant and criminally dangerous. It just seems like for you "gay" is synonymous with "bad," when an individual's character is independent of their sexual orientation.say all the state homes were run by gays. would that satisfy you ? because then, obviously, there would be no harm done to the children, simply because gays can do no wrong. what you are stating is that gays are free of any kind of that behaviour.
Again, where did I say or imply that? The overwhelming majority of heterosexual households I've come across in my life have been loving and more than suitable for raising children. The problem is you have it in your mind that for orphans the alternative to being adopted by gay parents is that they'll straight away be picked up by a heterosexual couple, when in reality they aren't adopted by ANYONE. NO-ONE. As in they have NO PARENTS. The worldwide supply of orphans *greatly* outweighs the demand. It's an extraordinarily sad reality of the world we live in. You want to know about broken childhoods? Ask someone who grew up in the foster care system, where they were constantly shifted around and never really rooted into a home, and ask for yourself if they felt blessed that their temporary foster parents were heterosexual. Consider that gay people are wanting to adopt kids that no-one else wants. That they first have to demonstrate that they have the means and motivation to love and care for a child. Do you really think an orphan, if faced with the prospect of the foster care system or having two mums or two dads, is going to care about their parents' sexuality??there ALL loving homes, right ? and of course, the majority of hetero couples are inherently violent.
Nice generalisation there. It's very well known that gay parents avoid the gay scene. You might see some for pride but it's a small minority.i guess the differance is, hetero people dont center thier lives around thier sexuality like gays do(pride?)
Because heaven forbid they teach them to judge others based on their character and not on their sexual orientation.so they dont open CHILDREN up to sexual indoctrination
HAHAHA!!! Erm, no. Don't hold me accountable for your unsophisticated thinking, poor reasoning, lousy analytical skills, and suggest I have some stupid vendetta against straight people. It's all in your dumb fucking head. (Irony bolded.its yet another form of homophobia in reverse. well done. you make yourself look more discrminitive by the post and it holds forth my argument that gays are even more phobic and or discriminitive than normal people.

1. I really do doubt the veracity of that story.have i tried being a normal person in gay social circles ? believe it or not, yes. and that when i lost respect for them, because unless they though that they could "turn" me, they dont want you to hang around.
2. So you judge all gays worldwide based on your miniscule experience of a handful of them, and extrapolate that they'll all behave the same way? And lesbians too? Lovely work there.
3. Nice construction of yourself as a "normal" who is venturing in to hang with the weird misfits. I'm sure they felt honoured that someone as powerful and normal as you actually reached down to little ol'lowly them.
And I will add that everything you write, right down to the crass way you write it, comes across anti-gay and homophobic. So don't cry and get all upset when people point out to you that you're a god damned bigot because it's exactly what you are. Own it. It's you.
Last edited: