i cheacked the search engine and nothin came up so I wanna know yalls thoughts on this. the cocaine thread made me think of it.
In AA and NA and basically anything Anonymous, the rule is "addiction is a disease, there is no cure, the only treatment is swearing off all drugs forever." they also teach cross addiction meaning...if you were a dopehead, and you get off dope, if you start drinking, you gonna be a alcoholic.
They almost treat it like in church, even doe some AA/Na's claim to not be affiliated with any religion and its just finding your "higher power." if your higher power is your dog, fine, they just want you to believe in a higher power i guess as somethign for you to hold onto.
But it reminds me of church confession where its like "you sinned but pray real hard and confess and you can be forgiven and hope for god to give you the strength to not do it again" type of shit.
I got many problems with the shit they teach. some of it is useful and some of it is the only thing that works for people because they NEED that black and white, right and wrong, to be able to stay sober cuz as soon as theres a gray area theyre already gone.
But to people who are interested in self control (hahahahaaa, i know.) or the idea that we have to MAKE ourselves stop....its like a cheap way out or some shit ya kno
I aint disregarding any help that NA or AA has gave anyone over time, they really help alot of people liek i said. but im someone who aint satisfied until i can say i did it myself. i think some people rather just have the safety and security of having rules they make for themselfes to keep them on track and some people always play devils advocate even to themselves. like i dont want to not do heroin cuz i removed myself from the people and places i associate with it. i wanna have a bag in front of me and turn it down, THATS when i know i truly conquered it, cuz otherwise its just puttin yourself in a "addiction proof" bubble that dont always work with the real world.
the way that the disease idea of addiction puts it is that if you are a addict, and you go to rehab or whatever and stop, you are still a addict even when the substance aint entered your body for the past 6 years. you still need your meetings, and that shit, and the theory goes that if you, even years later, came in contact with a chance to use your past drug of choice, you would have no choice in it, no control, because your "disease" would choose for you, and you would be right back there smokin rock or drinkin Seagrams again.
I know different branches of the Anonymouses and anyone who supports the disease model of addiction all put a different spin on it, and different counselors, and etc. all preachin the same thing but to different degrees. Kinda the same way theres a difference between a harsh old gospel baptist church where satans' comin anyday now and a "contemporary christian" church that accepts gays, etc.
So, what do yall think about addiction? I know its a complex thing and a thread just about addiction would be liek 5000 pages long. but my issue here is more related to the Anonymouses and how they present it as a ever constant battle and even if youre a junkie when youre 18 and quit that year, when youre 80 you still need to go to meetings and introduce yourself as My name is ____ and im a addict with 68 years of sobriety. LOL.
so what the word?
In AA and NA and basically anything Anonymous, the rule is "addiction is a disease, there is no cure, the only treatment is swearing off all drugs forever." they also teach cross addiction meaning...if you were a dopehead, and you get off dope, if you start drinking, you gonna be a alcoholic.
They almost treat it like in church, even doe some AA/Na's claim to not be affiliated with any religion and its just finding your "higher power." if your higher power is your dog, fine, they just want you to believe in a higher power i guess as somethign for you to hold onto.
But it reminds me of church confession where its like "you sinned but pray real hard and confess and you can be forgiven and hope for god to give you the strength to not do it again" type of shit.
I got many problems with the shit they teach. some of it is useful and some of it is the only thing that works for people because they NEED that black and white, right and wrong, to be able to stay sober cuz as soon as theres a gray area theyre already gone.
But to people who are interested in self control (hahahahaaa, i know.) or the idea that we have to MAKE ourselves stop....its like a cheap way out or some shit ya kno
I aint disregarding any help that NA or AA has gave anyone over time, they really help alot of people liek i said. but im someone who aint satisfied until i can say i did it myself. i think some people rather just have the safety and security of having rules they make for themselfes to keep them on track and some people always play devils advocate even to themselves. like i dont want to not do heroin cuz i removed myself from the people and places i associate with it. i wanna have a bag in front of me and turn it down, THATS when i know i truly conquered it, cuz otherwise its just puttin yourself in a "addiction proof" bubble that dont always work with the real world.
the way that the disease idea of addiction puts it is that if you are a addict, and you go to rehab or whatever and stop, you are still a addict even when the substance aint entered your body for the past 6 years. you still need your meetings, and that shit, and the theory goes that if you, even years later, came in contact with a chance to use your past drug of choice, you would have no choice in it, no control, because your "disease" would choose for you, and you would be right back there smokin rock or drinkin Seagrams again.
I know different branches of the Anonymouses and anyone who supports the disease model of addiction all put a different spin on it, and different counselors, and etc. all preachin the same thing but to different degrees. Kinda the same way theres a difference between a harsh old gospel baptist church where satans' comin anyday now and a "contemporary christian" church that accepts gays, etc.
So, what do yall think about addiction? I know its a complex thing and a thread just about addiction would be liek 5000 pages long. but my issue here is more related to the Anonymouses and how they present it as a ever constant battle and even if youre a junkie when youre 18 and quit that year, when youre 80 you still need to go to meetings and introduce yourself as My name is ____ and im a addict with 68 years of sobriety. LOL.
so what the word?