• N&PD Moderators: Skorpio | someguyontheinternet

Is 2ci and MAOI?

fungus44

Bluelighter
Joined
May 7, 2004
Messages
1,436
Location
Toronto, Canada
There was some discussion of the low level MAOI activity of MDMA.

I've found 2ci to be a pretty effective potentiator of tryptamines. I've also had the usual quesiness in the gut that many other users have, not unlike some other MAOIs.

I realize that it's no something easily discovered due to the wide prohibition on psychedelic research, but do folks have any ideas or knowledge?
 
I think it's very likely that it competes at MAO.
Breif research pulls up a newish paper from Dave Nichols, where if I'm not mistake compound 44 is 2CI and it reports an MAO-A IC50 of 43µM, but then there's no fucking way 2CI gets up to those kind of concentrations in recreational users.

Interestingly there are some thio- compounds (2CT) which have some serious IC50s ~100nM which are totally believable concs for those drugs to reach.

Still, assays are never perfect, and if that IC50 is out by a factor of 5, then that would be a serious MAOI.


[edit]Data 2nd references from Scorza, M. C.; Carrau, C.; Silveira, R.; Zapata-Torres, G.; Cassels,
B. K.; Reyes-Parada, M. Monoamine oxidase inhibitory properties
of some methoxylated and alkylthio amphetamine derivatives:
structure-activity relationships. Biochem. Pharmacol.
1997, 54, 1361-1369.[/edit]
 
Last edited:
BilZ0r said:
Interestingly there are some thio- compounds (2CT) which have some serious ~100nM which are totally believable concs for those drugs to reach.

As in 2C-T-7? 2 of the T7 deaths were in combination with MDMA, but I guess it's still a bit farfetched to say that this was due to MAO inhibition from the 2C-T-7.
 
What does IC50 mean wrt MAOs? And are the concentrations you mention plasma levels or in the brain (post-synaptic? is that what they're called?)
 
IC50: Inhibitory Concentration to reach 50% inhibition.

i.e. the concentration of a chemical needed to get 50% inhibition of whatever effect. In this case it will be inhibition of the rate of degredation of a chemical which MAO-A or B is selective for breaking down.
 
Some of the 2C-T-x's are competetive inhibitors at physiokogical concentration. Might go part of the way towards explaining how the 2C-T-x's have been the ones implicated in most deaths concerning PEA's - competetive MAOI + serotonogic agent = serotonin syndrome. All the 2C-T-x related deaths (2 for 2C-T-7 & 1 for 2C-T-21) all seemed to implicate hyperthermia as the cause of death, which is the characteristic of serotonin syndrome
 
2C-T-21 at least to me, which is just subjective really, "feels" like it releases some serotonin or something but who knows.
 
Interestingly there are some thio- compounds (2CT) which have some serious ~100nM which are totally believable concs for those drugs to reach.

How does this compare with other MAOIs?

Bit off topic, but how does AMTs supposed MAOI activity compare?
 
IC50s don't really tell you a lot... I mean, another drug could have a much lower potency IC50, but so long as it is selective it could be a perfectly good drug. With drugs like this, the important thing is to compare the IC50 to the concentration the drug reaches in the body.

According to this paper AMT is a MAOI, but I don't have online access, so I dont know about it's potency
 
AMT is a competetive MAOI, but it's only marginally more potent than amphetamine. Harmaline is effective at 10^-6M, yohimbine at 10^-4 and AMT at 10^-2M, so although it is technically a MAOI, it doesn't have any effect at doses normally encountered in the human body
 
Thanks all. On a related note: Do any of you know much about 2ci and its degradation? I understand it is unstable chemically. I've had a couple of experinces with a batch that has been passed around quite a bit without adulteration except for relatively clean utensils and/or fingers. The dose can go higher (25 or 30mg) and is more classically psychedelic a la a 1/2 g of mushrooms or low dose LSD than the relatively speedy feel of fresh 2ci.

Maybe it's placebo, but I don't think so.
 
What leads you to believe 2C-I is unstable? I am not saying you are wrong, but everything I have learned and been told about 4-halo-2,5-DMPEAs and 4-halo-2,5-DMAs has led me to believe that whatever halogen is in that 4-position holds on tight to that benzene ring, and doesn't let go. I do know most simple amphetamines and many other substituted phenethylamines are very stable.
 
^^^ You may well be right. I'm quite stupid re: molecular chemistry. I did think the iodine did increase instability and this powder has been through many environmental changes (heat & cool, humidity & dryness) compared to any of the other 2Cs I have personal knowledge of.

The subjective effects were quite different than what I was used to, but they may have been set & setting, no hopes except for some bliss and in a natural and firendly outdoorsy environment compared to my other 2ci experiences which have all been very urban.
 
2C-I is stable under the described conditions, any perceived change in activity is placebo. If there was a chemical decay, it would simply lead to a less potent product, but not one qualitatively different.
 
Top