N&PD Moderators: Skorpio
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.Iodine, 2C-I, and the Thyroid Gland
fastandbulbous
Bluelight Crew

BigBenn
Bluelighter
Since you are talking about an Iodine on a benzene I dont think these two things will happen as readily. Nucleophilic aromatic substitution is a pretty tough reaction to get to go (if I remember correctly) even with a good leaving group. You have to go through a benzyne intermediate (lots of steric strain, unstable) to get the substitution product.
Electrophilic aromatic substitution is a bit easier but I dont know if that would be related to the thyroid issues you are talking about.
EDIT:Now that I read the entire thread it looks like the thyroid issue is about thyroxine mimicking rather than actual iodine chemistry. Just disregard my post, I wont delete it as it might have a sliver of relevance ![]()
BigBenn
Bluelighter
Alkylating a benzene Iodine is more difficult than a primary secondary and probobly even a tertiary carbon.
Does anyone know of any medicinal compounds that use iodine in places other than on the benzene?Morninggloryseed
Bluelight Crew
fastandbulbous
Bluelight Crew
Jamshyd
Bluelight Crew
Hmm... does that apply to fluorine as well? 2C-T-21 has a fluoroethyl group attached to the thiol. Or maybe I am misunderstanding? Morninggloryseed
Bluelight Crew
fastandbulbous
Bluelight Crew
hugo24
Bluelighter
Yes,harder,but they still do.Theres an entire class of reactions "Palladium catalysed alkylation of amines,anilines,amides,alkines,phenols,boronates etc. like Suzuki,Buchwald-Hartwig".Even aromatic fluorides can react (Nitrofluorbenzenes,somewhere I've seen someone alkylating an indole with Fluorpyridin). Obviously,its about metal catalysis making the reaction possible altough there are examples not needing a precious metal help.
I wouldn't expect it in the body but I know practically zilch about metals and enzymatic reactions in our bodies.
"This is why DOMCL (4-chloromethyl-2,5-DMA) is a no-no even though animal testing shows it to be a powerful psychedelic, much stronger than DOM itself."--Hmm,is that one known?I guess its an irreversible ligand.Forever tripping.I know at least two who tried the 4-Fluoromethyl derivative,but without success.
Smyth:do you mean 4-TFMamphetamin?Thought about that one too.fastandbulbous
Bluelight Crew
Never thought about it like that! I was thinking much more about the possibility of alkylating a DNA base and causing all sorts of horrible things to go wrong; then again, permanent tripping doesn't sound like a barrel of laughs!
Just wondering, do you have any sources? And if so, how long did these symptoms last?OutOnTheVeranda
Bluelighter
mw 2CI: 307g/mol mw I: 127g/mol
127/307 * 15 = 6.2egor
Bluelighter
fastandbulbous
Bluelight Crew
mw 2CI: 307g/mol mw I: 127g/mol
127/307 * 15 = 6.2
No it pertains to ionic iodine ie as potassium iodide etc. Iodine attached to an aromatic ring isn't going anywhere unless it's surrounded by nitro groups (which it isn't in 2C-I). If iodine in any form was dangerous, they wouldn't be using any of the radiopaque dyes for x-ray contrast agents as that involves putting a fair bit of the dye into the body (they contain iodine as it somehow prevents x-rays from passing through so easily).
All the shit about worrying about iodine-131 from things like the Chenobyl accident refers to iodine contained in soil ets as potassium/sodium/other metal ion iodidesGeneral alcazar
Bluelighter