those would probably be alkylating agents, and thus carcinogenic. Unless the halogen would be fluorine.IGNVS said:i would ask him why he didnt make any 2c's with halogens attached to the carbon at the tail of a propyl chain off the 4 position.
does anyone know anything about that?
no qualms there fluorine it isplanckunit said:those would probably be alkylating agents, and thus carcinogenic. Unless the halogen would be fluorine.
Aldousage said:You've seen me refer to the phenomenon twice recently because it's currently in my head. Before joining Bluelight, I'd never seen anyone other than Shulgin use the word "taste" in that way.
As for literally tasting a chemical as a way of "getting to know it", I prefer using a capsule method to avoid chemical burn. I mean, are they ever tasty? Does an awareness of the subjective taste of a given substance really matter when considering mind-altering drugs?
Try to imagine a pharmacologist presenting the editor of a peer-reviewed journal a paper reporting on the flavour of an anti-convulsant... "Dr. Alveroy, this compound is absolutely DELICIOUS! I expect it will be regulated and marketable within six months!"
When I really want to "get to know" a drug, I "take it out for dinner" (in other words, I ingest it).
Peacelove,
Aldousage
P.S: Does anyone here refer to insufflation/snorting drugs as "smelling" them? As in "Have you guys smelled any of that coke Steve's got?" Again, to each his/her own, but I find it goofy. Maybe I'll change my mind...
Aldousage said:You've seen me refer to the phenomenon twice recently because it's currently in my head. Before joining Bluelight, I'd never seen anyone other than Shulgin use the word "taste" in that way.
As for literally tasting a chemical as a way of "getting to know it", I prefer using a capsule method to avoid chemical burn. I mean, are they ever tasty? Does an awareness of the subjective taste of a given substance really matter when considering mind-altering drugs?
Try to imagine a pharmacologist presenting the editor of a peer-reviewed journal a paper reporting on the flavour of an anti-convulsant... "Dr. Alveroy, this compound is absolutely DELICIOUS! I expect it will be regulated and marketable within six months!"
When I really want to "get to know" a drug, I "take it out for dinner" (in other words, I ingest it).
Peacelove,
Aldousage
P.S: Does anyone here refer to insufflation/snorting drugs as "smelling" them? As in "Have you guys smelled any of that coke Steve's got?" Again, to each his/her own, but I find it goofy. Maybe I'll change my mind...
Aldousage said:You've seen me refer to the phenomenon twice recently because it's currently in my head. Before joining Bluelight, I'd never seen anyone other than Shulgin use the word "taste" in that way.
As for literally tasting a chemical as a way of "getting to know it", I prefer using a capsule method to avoid chemical burn. I mean, are they ever tasty? Does an awareness of the subjective taste of a given substance really matter when considering mind-altering drugs?
Try to imagine a pharmacologist presenting the editor of a peer-reviewed journal a paper reporting on the flavour of an anti-convulsant... "Dr. Alveroy, this compound is absolutely DELICIOUS! I expect it will be regulated and marketable within six months!"
When I really want to "get to know" a drug, I "take it out for dinner" (in other words, I ingest it).
Peacelove,
Aldousage
P.S: Does anyone here refer to insufflation/snorting drugs as "smelling" them? As in "Have you guys smelled any of that coke Steve's got?" Again, to each his/her own, but I find it goofy. Maybe I'll change my mind...