This is more a question than a response.
Im sure you are aware of the prophecy, forshadowing, symbols, numerology, and allegory of bible.
(U seem to have studied Bible)
How do you explain the connections?
Conspiracy?
Just curious
This is my view - some of it I can back up with data, some of it is connections I have made from the data.
The bible is a book written for purpose. That purpose seems to be to give the Hyksos people a history. These were 'God's Chosen' who got booted out of Egypt by the polytheists in the South of Egypt, or Upper Egypt. The monotheists were rulers of the Necropolis which contained the Giza pyramids and (I think) those at Dashur and Saqqara.
It is very possible the 'mount' which Moses went 'into' was the Great Pyramid.
Exodus 24:18And Moses went into the midst of the cloud, and gat him up into the mount: and Moses was in the mount forty days and forty nights.
So... there you are, the chosen of the one true god, Aten and ruling the land, and then suddenly you aren't. How does one 'maintain the faith' that your God is the one true one when you've just been kicked out of home?
Invent a new story, one in which you were enslaved and your God freed you. That's why the Hebrew religion and book looks so much like the Egyptian religion and book. Why the tabernacle has a floor plan like some of the greatest of the ancient temples - even the ark appears just as some of the relics from Egypt.
The bible as 'history' is deeply flawed. There is no record Egypt EVER had slaves of the amount required for the Moses story to be true. No record of any mass exodus of slaves, nor even that slaves built the pyramids and monuments etc. Despite what we are told there is no record of hundreds of thousands of people wandering the desert for 40 years - perhaps an allegory for having to wait a generation so the young ones would grow up with the new story of their history and the older ones who knew the truth would die out?
One possibility I saw for the Hyksos leaving Egypt was they crossed a reed sea - the hieroglyphs for reed and red are apparently very similar - which was the swamps and marshes of the Nile Delta - if you didn't know the true path through you could very easily lose an entire army of chariots in such a place. But I haven't looked seriously at that idea - once I realised the logic behind the Hyksos being the Akhenaten mob the details were of less importance.
The bible is an amalgam of ancient tales - Noah's story cannot possibly be true as per the bible story because there are no records of major floods anywhere near the time he was supposed to be around. Some posit the Hebrews were in the Black Sea valley and the Flood is the story of how the Mediterranean came flooding in through the Bosporus channel, but that also makes the bible wrong, to time AND place.
I think Noah is the Gilgamesh story, dating from thousands of years before, when cataclysms almost wiped us off the map. As the Ice Age ended there were several disasters involving huge masses of ice hitting the ocean - the story of a boat containing the remnants of man could be from any of those.
We think (as in the consensus of history thinks) the ice melted slowly and the sea rose inch by inch across thousands of years. But there is significant evidence that this is NOT what happened at all. Approximately 1/3 of the Antarctic ice slid off into the ocean somewhere around 14,000 years ago. The tsunami from that would have been kilometres high. The sea level would have risen by maybe 30 metres
overnight and it would have rained heavily for months after as the freshwater melting changed the rainfall patterns. (the ice would head for the equator due to normal physics, melting and altering weather patterns - the fresh water would evaporate at a different rate and so on.
And here we get to the meat of what I think. I think what symbols and meaning is in the bible comes from the other civilisation, the one that existed before the disasters.
Just say you saw a disaster coming that would wipe out your civilisation. Nothing you can do to stop it. So you prepare as best you can but you want to preserve the knowledge to ease the path back to civilisation. I think THAT'S where all the encoded information and the links and symbols came from. I think they made a story that held the secrets that an adept could decipher and they also built at least some of those secrets into stone so they could not be lost. Then they made the story into a religion so it would pass unchanged through time. If god says 144,000 soldiers, that's a number that doesn't get changed by the religious.
Where it went wrong is, I think, nobody predicted THREE such disasters, one after another. I think too many Master-Apprentice links got broken and the secrets became true secrets because the chain of awareness was broken. Enough remained to kickstart some of the primitives into a higher level, but those societies all flowered abruptly then stagnated because they didn't have the background knowledge needed to innovate and build above what they'd been handed by 'the gods' who came from the sea.
But the religion passed along the stories and they got turned into dogma, and the stone records stood, muted by cataclysm, across thousands of years, waiting, like the sphinx with its riddle, for someone to crack the code and re-discover what the first civilisation wanted us to know.
Was it six months....? 
