If pot becomes legal, California's health will suffer, Stanford expert says

[cj]

Fuck this asshole he knows that if it is legalized in cali and society doesnt fall apart people are going to start asking tougher questions about LEOs priorities.

 

[Mr_Fluffykins]

WTF? Who sold you that baloney?
Here is a bibliography of several hundred studies done on second hand smoke for the past 30 years.

http://www.no-smoke.org/pdf/SHSBibliography.pdf

i exaggerated a little to even the playing field

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-AjXwSJtxGc

 

[seep]

We mix tobacco with weed to expand the volume, so essentially we're cutting it.

Whut?

I knew a girl from Spain who'd always roll joints like this and I hated smoking with her. I love tobacco but holding it in my lungs for as long as possible gives me nasty effects that are essentially a nicotine overdose. This is a poison and anyone who regularly smokes blended weed and tobacco must have a hell of a tolerance.

 

[slimvictor]

i exaggerated a little to even the playing field

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-AjXwSJtxGc

Penn and Teller are always interesting, but they clearly had a slant, and a point to be proven this time.
Their point - there is no completely convincing knock-down proof that second-hand smoke causes cancer or death. They are requiring a longitudinal study of a hundred thousand subjects, or something of the kind. None exists, presently. However, if you look at the link I posted, there are hundreds of studies that, taken together, strongly suggest a causal relationship between second-hand smoke and serious health effects. At this point, with this much data, it makes sense to assume that second-hand smoke causes some serious shit to happen. Unless you can come up with other stories explaining the results of those studies...