ChemicallyEnhanced
Bluelighter
Personally (again, either version of the movie), I would find her not guilty by extreme provocation* [an actual defence that includes everything up to and including murder - in the U.S.], although I believe this ruling just changes the charge(s) to manslaughter rather than have the person go free.
I'm just wondering where you (yes, YOU, specifically) lie on the moral-ethics of what she did.
*TBH, I'd wanna shake her hand and say "Yas queen"**
**my gay-self would also wanna yell "SLAYYYY! but...ya know...that'd be an oopsie-awkward
I'm just wondering where you (yes, YOU, specifically) lie on the moral-ethics of what she did.
*TBH, I'd wanna shake her hand and say "Yas queen"**
**my gay-self would also wanna yell "SLAYYYY! but...ya know...that'd be an oopsie-awkward
Last edited:
