Dresden
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2010
- Messages
- 3,212
N&PD Moderators: Skorpio | someguyontheinternet
Benzovalerone .. aka Pyrozepam ..
![]()
Interesting.
![]()
Frankly I have no idea what it will do. It might probably making it more or less potent. But I have come to realize that when it comes to psychoactives, small change can have huge impact and huge change little difference. So may make a good benzo maybe not..or a good stim or not... Just drawing molecules...but who knows..(putting a triazolo might not be bad idea but then again you ended up with triazolam isn't it?)How do you think that ring would you think this would change the effects? Imo if you are looking for a good benzo this isn't going to be good, and I'd guess that it's also not a stim...... although I'm much more certain about the good benzo part, you need at least some of the following for that - nitro group on r7, fluorine on r2', r1 methyl or a triazolo ring on top (good benzo for me means strong hypnotic).
a certain "lam"
I'll go with an amidine ?That... Figure out something other than oxygen and you might be on to something but I know who you are and you were on the right track with a certain "lam"
![]()
diphenidine/desoxypipradrol inspired
^ The amine in that piperidine ring up top serves the same role as that amphetamine N on the right - so instead of overlapping desoxypipradrol / amph it is more like a siamese twin.
You can make a cross-over drug based on desoxypipradrol and amphetamine, two actually - they already exist:
2-Benzylpiperidine
Beta-phenylmethamphetamine (and the non-methylated version you can also imagine)
But the chemical you suggest may actually have some activity as sort of weaker version of beta-phenylamphetamine. For that either the main phenyl ring or the beta phenyl ring would have to be at least remotely bioisosteric with the piperidine ring, so 2 chances for it to work. Something like cyclohexyl works (a la propylhexidrine), thiophene works (a la methiopropamine), piperidine is not quite as good I think... but maybe it works.
To offset all these new agonists:
.![]()
![]()
wonder if that works.