• N&PD Moderators: Skorpio | someguyontheinternet

I Like to Draw Pictures of Random Molecules

Status
Not open for further replies.
940311ketaminenoketone.png

(RS)-2-(2-Chlorophenyl)-2-(methylamino)cyclohexane
 
Shulgin didn't consider arylcyclohexylamines to be true psychedelic entheogens, and didn't care to do any reseach on them.

I think the ketamine analog I proposed without the keto must have been made? it's so obvious. And it must have increased duration than ketamine (?) Since the ketone is making it easier for the body to excrete it.

Funny thing is, as an analog you couldn't call it something with ketamine (like 2-meo-ketamine,n-ethyl-ketamine etc) because the "keta" in ketamine comes from ketone, and it would be pretty stupid to just call it "amine" 8)

Quare, you have some lazy software that writes the right IUPAC?
 
1PcKFva.png

R7K8S3J.png


(Remember I know fuck all about SAR :D if you're wondering why the second one - I based it on the fact that Mephtetramine appears to be active, even if people are reporting poor results. Wanted to make something that looks like it really wouldn't be active but that might be.)

Edit:

I was bored so here's a few more:
ryUJhtY.png

0SMOCLM.png


I'm guessing the second from last was already made and probably mentioned in PiHKAL somewhere but I was a bit too lazy to check.
 
Last edited:
2C-B-Ind isn't quite the same thing. this is from the 2C-B-Ind Wikipedia article:

2CB-ind_structure.png


the aminoindane version that anon posted looks more promising to me. 2C-B-Ind tries to squeeze an extra carbon atom in there.
 
Why hasn't someone invented a machine where you can upload a picture and receive a couple of hundred milligrams of sample to experiment with. It would be much more efficient than all this speculation :-)

Edit: Should the molecule be called DMAI-B?
 
Last edited:
Why hasn't someone invented a machine where you can upload a picture and receive a couple of hundred milligrams of sample to experiment with.

it's called a computer :P

The rigid aminoindane analogue of DOM was made by Nichols in 1972, as well as the slightly more potent tetralin analogue. It's something close to 1/5 to 1/10 the potency of DOM and has a different character... more of a stimulant, apparently.

see Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 1974, vol. 17, p. 161
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top