• BASIC DRUG
    DISCUSSION
    Welcome to Bluelight!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Benzo Chart Opioids Chart
    Drug Terms Need Help??
    Drugs 101 Brain & Addiction
    Tired of your habit? Struggling to cope?
    Want to regain control or get sober?
    Visit our Recovery Support Forums
  • BDD Moderators: Keif’ Richards

I just can't keep away from alcohol!

I disagree, taking gabapentin never did anything for me in benzo withdrawal, all it ever did was give me an even worse withdrawal than the benzos afterwards...

Taper the benzo slowly and DO NOT use other drugs to mitigate the symptoms. If you can't handle it then taper even slower. I've been through so many withdrawals so many times I've learnt the hard way that using one drug to get off another is a really shitty idea. You might easily end up even worse than you were before with 2 addictions instead of one.

Sometimes the positives outweigh the negatives especially if used for a limited period of time. You were addicted to gabapentin, which is influencing your bias in that statement. For someone in gabaergic withdrawal, an anti-glutaminergic is essential, to stop neurotoxicity, specifically apoptosis due to excitotoxicity -- acting as a neuroprotective agent. There dozens of anecdotes and studies, which state that gabapentin, and anti-convulsants in general are more than effective for benzodiazepine and alcohol withdrawal.

You can disagree with me based on personal experience, but you can't disagree with science. Letting your personal feelings about gabapentin bleed into this, in an attempt to coerce someone into not using a medication which is very effective, is counter-productive, and a bit cynical.
 
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the situation is one where there is alcohol addiction along with other addictions...typically associated with depression and anxiety. Brain-damage is assured. The most direct path to no drugs is optimum. At the expense of personal discomfort? Well duhh...yes of course at the expense of personal discomfort...at the expense of possible brain-damage ? Yes, brain-damage (like discomfort) is already a certainty. That's the whole point of cutting this crap out ASAP. Use something else to compensate for this or that...all this reasoning is based on wanting out of discomfort. This is chasing the wind, and will often result in...just more drugs, different addictions, reinforced refusal to grow, more depression, more brain-damage etc...

Some of the advice here is coming from a position that places personal comfort at the top. At no time must comfort be compromised (The mind-set of the drug-addict). From this position, failure is assured. Addicts just don't get that, do we. More drug-use and related depression and brain-damage is assured. Oh, but at least we got out of having to deal with personal discomfort...

Until recovery is at the top, and personal discomfort at the bottom, you're just pissing in the wind.
There's a fair bit of this going on around here. At least you'll not be alone....

You make it sound like medications are the devil, wherein by most standards, they are there to HELP people, not get them addicted. Chemical solutions, aren't they, but air and food are made of chemicals too.

Yes, food is made of chemicals too. A great many people destroy their lives with food.
Thinking of food/meds as the devil is fine in the context of addiction. Better than what the addict thinks of them...salvation? looool Medications are the Problem/Devil when assuming a position that says "It's always better to medicate than to endure discomfort" or "How I feel is always more important than dealing with addiction".
He'll not die from properly structured withdrawal, nor from enduring the uncomfortable process. Without food or air life ends with certainty, no matter how gradual you taper off.

"Statistically speaking, cold turkey w/d is a poor solution, as a huge percentage of people relapse far more rapidly with this method than any other."

Taper off then, with focus on "steeper is better". This HAS to be the focus, other wise who cares anyhow? If the person does not want to get free from addiction, non of it matters anyhow. The goodness (in all it's dimensions) of living without drug-addiction is the ultimate goal. Until this has been reached, it will be difficult and uncomfortable. The aim is to arrive at the Goal as soon as possible. Before motivation runs out. Before the belief that "sobriety is good and worth the struggle" is replaced with the old crap...i.e. fuck it...who cares...my life is unusually painful...blah blah blah
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sometimes the positives outweigh the negatives especially if used for a limited period of time. You were addicted to gabapentin, which is influencing your bias in that statement. For someone in gabaergic withdrawal, an anti-glutaminergic is essential, to stop neurotoxicity, specifically apoptosis due to excitotoxicity -- acting as a neuroprotective agent. There dozens of anecdotes and studies, which state that gabapentin, and anti-convulsants in general are more than effective for benzodiazepine and alcohol withdrawal.

You can disagree with me based on personal experience, but you can't disagree with science. Letting your personal feelings about gabapentin bleed into this, in an attempt to coerce someone into not using a medication which is very effective, is counter-productive, and a bit cynical.

Yes my oppinion is based solely on personal experience and is totally biased, you are correct, but if I can spare just one person the horror I've had to go through because of this medicine, then it is totally worth it in my point of view.

Also, if an anti-glutaminergic really was that essential for benzodiazepine withdrawal, I could argue that it would be a much more widely adopted practice. I've been to detox a couple of times and I was never prescribed gabapentin (nor any other anti-glutaminergic for that matter). Nor did I hear about anyone else that was. The thing they give for benzo withdrawal is; more benzos to taper with. And that's usually all you need.

I used gabapentin for 4 weeks only. I used benzos for years before that. The gabapentin withdrawal is/was WAY WORSE than the one from the benzos. Even though I had been using them for a much longer time period.

I am sorry if I seem cynical and maybe I am but I took it for the reason you mentioned and for a limited period of time and I ended up even worse than I was before.
 
Last edited:
Sometimes the positives outweigh the negatives especially if used for a limited period of time. You were addicted to gabapentin, which is influencing your bias in that statement. For someone in gabaergic withdrawal, an anti-glutaminergic is essential, to stop neurotoxicity, specifically apoptosis due to excitotoxicity -- acting as a neuroprotective agent. There dozens of anecdotes and studies, which state that gabapentin, and anti-convulsants in general are more than effective for benzodiazepine and alcohol withdrawal.

You can disagree with me based on personal experience, but you can't disagree with science. Letting your personal feelings about gabapentin bleed into this, in an attempt to coerce someone into not using a medication which is very effective, is counter-productive, and a bit cynical.

This is certainly overstating the efficacy of gabapentin and pregabalin in treating benzodiazepine withdrawal. I recommend reading this thread where this was recently discussed.

Gabapentin is NOT sufficient to treat large benzodiazepine or alcohol habits. It will not stop the seizures, is not cross-tolerant and while it can certainly help mitigate SOME of the symptoms, alone is simply not enough.

Saying gabapentin is 'more than enough' is not only factually inaccurate, but potentially dangerous if someone with a large alcohol or benzodiazepine habit tries to stop completely and subtitute gabapentin or pregabalin. As discussed in the other thread linked above, gabapentin's effects are primarily due to non-GABAergic mechanisms of action and is absolutely, undeniably NOT a GABAA agonist and therefore is NOT sufficient to treat alcohol or benzo withdrawal alone if someone was strongly physically dependent.
 
I'm sure it is but you have to ask yourself if it's really worth adding another addictive drug to the mix especially if the relief it brings is as minimal as I experienced gabapentin to be during benzo withdrawal (almost non-existant tbh). To me this seems really counter-productive.
 
No, of course there are people who simply develop a poly-drug addiction. One has to ask themself how much they truly want to quit their substance. It can be a great way to reduce pain, or merely a deeper hole.
 
^ you're absolutely right and I didn't mean to imply there is NO clinical utility, in fact there is a lot. I just thought saying it's 'more than enough' across the board was overstating it.

As far as it's anticonvulsant efficacy, as mentioned in the other thread, it's so poor of an anticonvulsant that it requires concomitant administration with another anticonvulsant to treat seizures.

For mild-moderate benzo and alcohol withdrawal, I would agree that it's preferable to using benzos in many cases. I was strictly speaking about severe cases where grand-mal seizures and even death (primarily in the case of alcohol) are real possibilities. One of my professors in the addictions counseling program had a gentlemen come in for an assessment who was intoxicated and their normal protocol was to have them wait to sober up enough to drive home but he was so severely dependent that he would experience severe DT's if his BAC dropped below the legal limit so they had to call his wife in and instruct her on how much alcohol to give him in order to prevent him from seizing while transporting him to detox. I was more so speaking about cases in severity closer to this.
 
Thank you all for your responses. I heard gabapentin wasn't really useful for anxiety except in really high doses. I'm just so afraid of benzo withdrawal and having a seizure, I guess I'll just ask my doctor what he thinks it's best when it's time. I've cut alcohol out a lot, which means I've had to up my benzo use a bit as my anxiety gets pretty bad.... but I'm just really afraid of this whole tapering thing. I've been so used to being on benzos and alcohol that going without is gonna take a lot of willpower.

I know it won't be easy, but I know it will be worth it.
 
Yes, its certainly worth it. You'll be avoiding a lot of negative cognitive and neurochemical consequences. Ask about tapering using diazepam.

^ you're absolutely right and I didn't mean to imply there is NO clinical utility, in fact there is a lot. I just thought saying it's 'more than enough' across the board was overstating it.

As far as it's anticonvulsant efficacy, as mentioned in the other thread, it's so poor of an anticonvulsant that it requires concomitant administration with another anticonvulsant to treat seizures.

For mild-moderate benzo and alcohol withdrawal, I would agree that it's preferable to using benzos in many cases. I was strictly speaking about severe cases where grand-mal seizures and even death (primarily in the case of alcohol) are real possibilities. One of my professors in the addictions counseling program had a gentlemen come in for an assessment who was intoxicated and their normal protocol was to have them wait to sober up enough to drive home but he was so severely dependent that he would experience severe DT's if his BAC dropped below the legal limit so they had to call his wife in and instruct her on how much alcohol to give him in order to prevent him from seizing while transporting him to detox. I was more so speaking about cases in severity closer to this.

Agreed. Cheers.
 
I am prescribed gabapentin, it does help a tiny bit but if i was going through all the anxiety that you are it probably wouldn't help much. I hate my old psychiatrist who believed gabapentin is such a cure for anxiety as she was completely opposed to benzos. Now i find out that gabapentin withdrawals may not be quiet as bad as benzos but are up their, my philosophy is if you are going to have me dependent on something atleast make sure it works. I'm dependent on a medication that barely helps me and gabapentin makes you feel very foggy and spaced out ALL THE TIME, I've been on it for 6 months now and feel so spaced out all the time. My new psychiatrist got me started on klonopins which i do not take everyday as prescribed on purpose to avoid becoming depedent on them.
 
Do you use the klonopin at the same time as the gabapentin? That could be why you're so tired all the time. I also found pregabalin to be much better than gabapentin as you have to take loads of gabapentin as the BA is terrible if I remember correctly.
 
^ you're absolutely right and I didn't mean to imply there is NO clinical utility, in fact there is a lot. I just thought saying it's 'more than enough' across the board was overstating it.

As far as it's anticonvulsant efficacy, as mentioned in the other thread, it's so poor of an anticonvulsant that it requires concomitant administration with another anticonvulsant to treat seizures.

For mild-moderate benzo and alcohol withdrawal, I would agree that it's preferable to using benzos in many cases. I was strictly speaking about severe cases where grand-mal seizures and even death (primarily in the case of alcohol) are real possibilities. One of my professors in the addictions counseling program had a gentlemen come in for an assessment who was intoxicated and their normal protocol was to have them wait to sober up enough to drive home but he was so severely dependent that he would experience severe DT's if his BAC dropped below the legal limit so they had to call his wife in and instruct her on how much alcohol to give him in order to prevent him from seizing while transporting him to detox. I was more so speaking about cases in severity closer to this.

behindblueeyes said:
I don't binge every night anymore (just my nights off work), but the cravings are still there. And I know this is contributing to my depression/anxiety.

The OP has clearly indicated that their habit is not severe. So what you're "strictly speaking about" is impertinent to the OP. As for gabapentin and its anti-convulsant properties, it is an anti-convulsant, but as you've stated and I have in dozens of tramadol threads, it's not sufficient at treating grand mal seizures, and is usually used an adjunct therapy to other anti-convulsants. There are however, over 40 different kinds of seizures, with each working differently. Nonetheless, their efficacy is more than proven in alcohol and benzodiazepine withdrawal, and I'm glad the studies provided were sufficient for you to change your perspective on outdated methodologies in treatment of gabaergic withdrawal (eg. stand-alone diazepam).

Cane2Left said:
As discussed in the other thread linked above, gabapentin's effects are primarily due to non-GABAergic mechanisms of action and is absolutely, undeniably NOT a GABAA agonist and therefore is NOT sufficient to treat alcohol or benzo withdrawal alone if someone was strongly physically dependent.

There's a difference between "more than effective" and "more than enough". More than effective means that the suggested medication itself is effective, at doing what it's intended to do. "More than enough" suggests that the medication is sufficient on its own. I don't think I negated that benzodiazepines should be tapered or used in alcohol withdrawal.

Alcohol (and gabaergic withdrawal in general) cause down-regulation of gaba-a and possibly an implication at gaba-b receptors, plus an up-regulation of glutamate. An abundance of glutamate induces excitotoxicity, or hyperexcitability of neurons due to NMDA activation through increased activity at calcium-channels. This is turn leads to cell suicide, and upsets the stimulatory/inhibitory balance in the brain. Here is where seizures, neuropathy, and damage to the nervous system come into the picture. These "non-gabaergic mechanisms" you speak of are completely irrelevant (or completely relevant as the case may be) when an understanding is achieved on how gabaergic withdrawal works. Allow me to elaborate:

Of course it's always ideal to taper, lowering the benzodiazepine doses in fragments allows glutamate to adjust slowly, instead of suddenly denying your brain of gaba-agonism, and leaving it exposed to a glutaminergic storm. There is an aspect however, that benzodiazepines alone don't address, which is the most important aspect, docking high glutaminergic transmission through calcium-channel-blockade. Gabapentin/pregabalin, tend to be very potent calcium-channel-blockers. While the benzodiazepine, would only be effective at maintaining gaba enhancement at starved receptors. Hence why most of the time, if not almost always during extremely heavy alcohol and GHB habits, users can be completely resistant to the effect of benzodiazepines (as seen in various case reports). On top of that, there's a gaba-b aspect in alcohol withdrawal which benzodiazepines alone don't cover.

Hyperexcitability following chronic alcohol exposure appears to result in enhanced activation of glutamatergic synapses in the brain. This enhanced glutamatergic transmission probably results from a combination of increased NMDA receptor activation, decreased GABAA receptor activation and increased function of voltage-activated calcium channels.
Source:http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1530-0277.1993.tb00720.x/abstract

the studies reviewed here provide suggestive evidence that PGB might constitute a novel efficacious and safe pharmacological treatment in both chronic and heavy alcohol and BDZ abuse and dependence. Moreover, PGB could also help in the treatment of symptoms of protracted withdrawal from alcohol, which extend up to 1 year beyond its cessation, such as anxiety and sleep disturbances [35]. This could enrich the available pharmacological armamentarium, which asfar, includes virtually only carbamazepine [36]
Pregabalin in the Treatment of Alcohol and Benzodiazepines Dependence

Related reading:
Chronic ethanol exposure enhacing NMDA activity and increasing sensitivity to excitotoxicity
Glutamate excitotoxicity in ethanol withdrawal
Ethanol inhibits excitotoxicity
Protective effect of gabapentin on N-methyl-D-aspartate-induced excitotoxicity in rat hippocampal CA1 neurons.
Baclofen In Ethanol Withdrawal
Role of GABA-B in Ethanol Withdrawal

Baclofen, an anti-convulsant, and a benzodiazepine (taper) are always things I suggest during gabaergic withdrawal. With the baclofen exclusively in gaba-b withdrawal. It honestly baffles me that people still think that benzodiazepines are alone sufficient at treating GHB, alcohol, and benzodiazepine withdrawal. Sometimes doctors opt to inject people with double, and even sometime triple digit milligrams of benzodiazepines to patients who are irresponsive, when the solution is right under their nose -- adding an anti-convulsant. In time though, the perspective will change, and they will become less underrated, something which is currently happening gradually.

As an aside, there is a huge amount of concomitant pregabalin/benzodiazepine users that can easily rotate both substances, myself included. Even though you did well to elaborate on the pharmacology of gabapentin/pregbalin in the thread provided, it still remains unknown, and a cross-tolerance is still suspect to many users. My guess would be due to their previously suggested action on GAD.
 
Last edited:
Chrom, I apologize for misinterpreting your statements and taking them out of context. I should have read more closely. Not that it's much of a defense in this case, but I tend to always read BL threads in the context of someone searching for certain information down the road and try to imagine what they might extrapolate from what's said. Over the years I've been PMed by so many people doing just that so I always see posts in that light but in doing so, lose sight of the original circumstances sometimes. Thank you for pointing that out.

Also, thank you for adding some truly excellent and impressively comprehensive information to this discussion!
 
Chrom, I apologize for misinterpreting your statements and taking them out of context. I should have read more closely. Not that it's much of a defense in this case, but I tend to always read BL threads in the context of someone searching for certain information down the road and try to imagine what they might extrapolate from what's said. Over the years I've been PMed by so many people doing just that so I always see posts in that light but in doing so, lose sight of the original circumstances sometimes. Thank you for pointing that out.

Also, thank you for adding some truly excellent and impressively comprehensive information to this discussion!

It's not problem at all. You're only vice is worrying about accurate HR advice being passed on (which most people who care are guilty of), something which is reflected in most, if not all of your posts. I just felt the need to clarify that I wasn't disregarding the role of benzodiazepines, or overstating the role of anti-convulsants, only that they need to work in tandem to achieve clinical benefit.

Our discussion has helped reach that conclusion, so I can be thankful to you for that.
 
Top