Okami
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2011
- Messages
- 496
Recently whilst at a festival I tried ketamine and went on a bit of a binge (it’s hard to tell how much I did because I gave out lines, lines were given to me etc) but I reckon over the course of 4 days I did approximately 1-1.5g. (First drug I can actually see myself potentially being addicted to)
Anyway I got home and started to do my research and stumbled across Olney's lesions. I then found the following sentences on the PCP article on wikipedia. "According to recent research, Olney's lesions only appear in the brains of rodents. This is due to the fact that they lack a major metabolic enzyme that is essential to breaking down NMDA receptor antagonists in the brain. This enzyme is found in humans and makes humans essentially immune to Olney's lesions as has been shown with ketamine." Unfortunately the reference is a book that I don't have and a short article on erowid which is quite vague.
Does this mean that brain damage isn't a concern with the long term effects of ketamine use, only the various bladder problems and other such stuff? Or is that an optimistic statement of the type that people who claim that mdma isn't neurotoxic make. Do we simply not know? Surely it can't be too bad considering that ketamine is used as an anaesthetic in the third world?
If it is neurotoxic or if its not known whether it is, what is a reasonable safe amount to do and how often. I usually restrict my mdma use to at most once a month of 100-125mg and refrain from redosing and the VERY rare occasions I do I only take another 50mg to prolong it. Although they are obviously completely different, what would be the ketamine equivalent of this sort of, erring on the side of caution, use?
Anyway I got home and started to do my research and stumbled across Olney's lesions. I then found the following sentences on the PCP article on wikipedia. "According to recent research, Olney's lesions only appear in the brains of rodents. This is due to the fact that they lack a major metabolic enzyme that is essential to breaking down NMDA receptor antagonists in the brain. This enzyme is found in humans and makes humans essentially immune to Olney's lesions as has been shown with ketamine." Unfortunately the reference is a book that I don't have and a short article on erowid which is quite vague.
Does this mean that brain damage isn't a concern with the long term effects of ketamine use, only the various bladder problems and other such stuff? Or is that an optimistic statement of the type that people who claim that mdma isn't neurotoxic make. Do we simply not know? Surely it can't be too bad considering that ketamine is used as an anaesthetic in the third world?
If it is neurotoxic or if its not known whether it is, what is a reasonable safe amount to do and how often. I usually restrict my mdma use to at most once a month of 100-125mg and refrain from redosing and the VERY rare occasions I do I only take another 50mg to prolong it. Although they are obviously completely different, what would be the ketamine equivalent of this sort of, erring on the side of caution, use?
