I think that they should legalise drugs that tend to not be too addictive, well at least not physically addictive. Like marijuana, LSD, MDMA , ketamine and a bunch of other RC's (2C-C, 2C-I, DOB, DOI etc). I think there are alot of substances out there that a large population can use safely and not have the associated risks or health problems that other drugs have like meth, crack or heroin etc. I know for a fact that if I could buy pharmacutical (sic) grade MDMA, LSD etc and could buy qaulity weed I wouldn't even bother looking for anything else. The thing is half the time Im chasing a hit of acid or a pill all I can find is meth or other stuff I dont really want as much. But it exposes me to these substances and Im definately more likely to try them.
In conclusion I dont think that making heroin or crack or even meth is a good thing to do. But, they should definately legalise almost all of the rest. Plus they need to break the social tabboo of drug use in the community. And steer in the direction of consumer education and harm reduction.
Read the first several chapters at http://druglibrary.org/schaffer/Library/studies/cu/cumenu.htm In short, all of these drugs were on sale without any restrictions at all at one time. Kids could buy them. There were no laws on labeling or advertising. People didn't even know what they were taking and the makers often advertised that their concoction would cure any illness had by you or your mule.
Even under those conditions, these drugs were not considered to be a major problem and there was no movement to get them outlawed, as there was with alcohol.
The problems didn't start until 1915, when the prohibition law went into effect.
