Such a good reminder - often in the car my gf gets so afraid of my driving at times, but I've said to her something similar about two confused people is infinitely worse than one confused person and another making a bold move.
Unless it's a "watch out!" moment, I disregard any criticism until
after I've finished driving, and I do it automatically without hesitation or flinching. Not because I know my driving is without fault, it isn't, but because I
know that if I go inside my own head even for a second to contemplate the validity of the criticism I am taking my attention inwards instead of being outwards on the road.
I hate people who ask questions or instil any sort of doubt when driving, when approaching say a junction or some scenario where you do need to think inwardly for a brief moment.. but you can't do your own and their calculation simultaneously. They
know at some level they're fucking your attention. Women have a habit of doing this, the 'shit test'. Which is fine, it's natural and often unintentional, but again.. disregard until I'm done doing what I have to. And then call them out on it (or they'll do it again) - especially with female partners, you have to call them out and logic them into not doing that shit again.
Reading what you wrote it seems like the confidence and doubt can be balanced by in the moment vs out the moment.
For me personally, it took me some time to learn how. But ultimately what it boils down to though is not really learning, because you already know it (your self), it's more getting out of your own way and just having faith in your own ability. Not allowing others to gaslight you, instil doubt or fear, or try to fuck with your attention (intentionally or unintentionally).
I'm reminded of the TED talk by Apollo Robbins, a pick pocket, on 'misdirection'. I think that fits into this discussion. He is someone who has mastered the ability to be confident while respecting the 'flow' of doubt (the other persons own awareness). I'm not sure how to word it into this discussion, I'm busy at the moment, but I feel there's something in there that might add to your contemplations.
I wonder
@-=SS=- , do you think there are reasons to be analytical in the moment too? Like what the hell is mindfulness anyway. Is it going with the flow, or noticing things analytically from a birds eye view, or both?
I guess it depends on what you're doing, and how much you can afford to have your attention 'inside' and for how long i.e. the driver, the fighter pilot, etc, versus the academic sitting at a desk under no pressure.
In real world scenarios as it were, I think intuition is far more valuable than pure analytical thinking. There is no accurate definition of what intuition is, but as revealed by hypnosis the brain/awareness is actually capable of processing and storing so much more than we perceive in our narrow moment to moment view of things, and intuition (to me) is in part the ability to access that almost instantaneous high-level computational ability that is going on in the background all the time. EDIT: This sort of feeds into the pick pocket thing.. you're not going to analytically recognise what's happening, you don't even have time to, but you
could recognise it with intuition as it's happening.
I forget who said it, but the mind can never perceive (think of) the infinite, but the mind can
become infinite. Obviously this discussion is bridging psychology, philosophy, and ontology, so everyone has their own interpretation of things, so ultimately again what it really boils down to is
you having faith in
you. Only you know the inside of your head, only you know how to navigate it, and only you hold yourself up.
Not sure where I'm going with this, but hoping some of this mud will stick to the walls.