-
RT&DC Moderators: Senior Staff
How intense are the results?
- Thread starter Orco
- Start date
stardragon
Bluelighter
Apparently it's a rather faint kind of salmon red-orange colour, definitely not a brilliant red like you get that nice dark purple-black with Marquis and lovely dark blue with Simon's. You need to make sure you give it enough time to react (it may take a few minutes) and be very sure you use the right proportions of the reagents, as well as enough of the pill (much more than the tiny scraping you need for a Marquis test).
[ 13 August 2002: Message edited by: stardragon ]
[ 13 August 2002: Message edited by: stardragon ]
*chaoscat*
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2000
- Messages
- 957
^ People say it gives a very faint reaction, so it is likely to be more like the colours on the left side of this chart, rather than the dark red on the right.
aj
Bluelighter
It may be a good idea to read the instructions concerning ROBADOPE on our pages.
It is pretty important that you use quite a lot of powder, no more than 1 drop of ROBADOPE and at least 2 drops of BUFFER.
A 'good clean' pill will definitely not show the typical salmon/red reaction.
aj
It is pretty important that you use quite a lot of powder, no more than 1 drop of ROBADOPE and at least 2 drops of BUFFER.
A 'good clean' pill will definitely not show the typical salmon/red reaction.
aj
mayday
Bluelighter
I have seen a colour change chaoscat...
it does go quite red, but when I first used the robadope test, I thought it had already changed colour because it is pink already...
it does go quite red, but when I first used the robadope test, I thought it had already changed colour because it is pink already...
hey guys,
let me tell you that with a normal/good pill, you don't see a change in color. so you have this test and you wanna get your money's worth , so you wanna see a color reaction. When your pill is OK, the test doesn't work, no reaction, bummer... BUT, that is a good sign.. It is all about cross referencing tha outcomes to know what is going on.. experiment! get some speed or mda that you know is ok, try it and then we'll talk some more, OK?
let me tell you that with a normal/good pill, you don't see a change in color. so you have this test and you wanna get your money's worth , so you wanna see a color reaction. When your pill is OK, the test doesn't work, no reaction, bummer... BUT, that is a good sign.. It is all about cross referencing tha outcomes to know what is going on.. experiment! get some speed or mda that you know is ok, try it and then we'll talk some more, OK?
Jungle Bunny
Bluelighter
Although my comment is irrelevant but also relevant I find it best to preface my whole spiel by saying that diversity in expression is a well needed concept in ANY discussion. My comment: I find it bizarre to go to any drug testing facility (like in Holland for example) and essentially say "Hey, I'm an advocate for braking the law, please test my illegal substances for me and then kindly return them for my illegal consumption." Although I'm pleased there are establishments like this it really does make me think. "Ravers" have a verity of different looks, with most being very distinguishing. The staff of the drug testing facilities are not oblivious in any shape fashion or form. They are human and thus base opinions on what comes before them and how often a particular genre of people come in to test their drugs. When they see shows like 20/20 doing "Drug Rave exposé" do not they reflect on the type of people that frequent their facilities? Does not these facilities perpetuate the belief that the Underground Electronic Community widely use illegal substances. Granted drugs are done in churches, schools, jails, court rooms so forth and so on and they don't get a fundamental "bad" rep. The question I now put to you is this: When drugs are discussed openly in forums like this how does that reflect legally on organizations like "Blue Light." Do THEY get a fundamentally "bad" rep for our actions? Idealism is contagious. DjDemoDirect.Co.Uk