• Philosophy and Spirituality
    Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Threads of Note Socialize
  • P&S Moderators: JackARoe | Cheshire_Kat

How does god keep track of everything?

God uses an iphone spreadsheet app which was free.

as an aside, every time God blesses someone with a miracle or whatnot, He is not saying "bless this person, in particular", He is saying "fuck the rest of the universe, in particular."
 
^
Another way to look at it is,
Everytime you refuse a blessing from God you are saying-
"Im not ready for this blessing God."

God's just agreeing with you.
 
willow11 said:
Not coincidence or creation. Cosmos.
Click to expand...
sorry Willow, I have t say I think you fall in this instance, yours is an intellectually inconsistent reply. The Cosmos is matter, so how did this amazing matter shoot forth into being?
 
Ransom itch said:
sorry Willow, I have t say I think you fall in this instance, yours is an intellectually inconsistent reply. The Cosmos is matter, so how did this amazing matter shoot forth into being?
Click to expand...
It may be that the matter and energy is simply one manifestation of the Cosmos. After all, what we see and experience is limited not enabled by our senses. String theory seems to rely on 10 dimensions based around a rolled up brane to form the string and we live in 3.

Personally I don't hold with time being another dimension, I think time is our experience, a moving NOW that lets us experience an apparency of cause and effect, but I'm not wedded to the idea. even so, that's a lot of dimensions we don't experience.

Add to that the non-physical things we all experience, from knowing who is on the phone to having others say exactly the thought yuo just had (and many more) and it seems obvious there is a lot more going on than our experience of The Solid can account for.

A bald statement such as, "the Cosmos is matter" is perhaps a little beyond anything we can currently prove.
 
^
Time is just another deminsion of space.
It doesnt exist alone.
Can time exist without space?
If it can it would exist for exactly zero seconds.
You need space for time.
Time is really just a measurement of space at different positions
Nothing to measure, time doesnt exist.
Something to measure, time exist.
 
But if the Universe is a hologram, there is NO space. It's illusion and the physics seems to say that is how things are.

Mind is also a hologram field so perhaps we have one hologram that is exploring another. Time may not exist at all, but maybe duration does and is intimately linked to the Being, not to Space.

Time as a dimension is mainly connected to Relativity and Relativity doesn't really work for an active aether (spelt like that to distinguish from the dead mechanistic 'ether' usually talked about in the current dead mechanistic universe of modern physics :D) The Michelson-Morley experiment wasn't really a flop and others have duplicated it and gotten results, but Einstein's ideas dominate the landscape and other ideas don't get air time.

James Clerk Maxwell proposed a whole expanded version of forces that got truncated (both the forces and the formulae for them) by Oliver Heaviside and others after Maxwell died early.
Maxwell expressed electromagnetism in the algebra of quaternions and made the electromagnetic potential the centerpiece of his theory. In 1881 Heaviside replaced the electromagnetic potential field by force fields as the centerpiece of electromagnetic theory. According to him, the electromagnetic potential field was arbitrary and needed to be "assassinated" (sic). A few years later there was a great debate between Heaviside and Tate about the relative merits of vector analysis and quaternions. The result was the realization that there was no need for the greater physical insights provided by quaternions if the theory was purely local, and vector analysis became commonplace.
Click to expand...
His equations required a 4th dimension that I don't think was Time. Those equations (quaternions) got scrapped for vector algebra - wholly 3D versions.
On p. 562, he summarizes the different subjects of the 20 equations, being three equations each for magnetic force, electric currents, electromotive force, electric elasticity, electric resistance, total currents; and one equation each for free electricity and continuity.
Click to expand...

If we'd had the full Maxwell we might have had antigravity decades ago. Thomas Townsend-Browne developed flying disks using electrostatic and electromotive ideas and the antigravity went dark after he demonstrated them to the US military.

So, if all that is so, and a practical application of a theory would seem to say it is, then Time may not be what Relativity says and the reason physics and cosmology are getting so complicated is that we have the wrong theory.
 
Journyman16 said:
Mind is also a hologram field so perhaps we have one hologram that is exploring another. Time may not exist at all, but maybe duration does and is intimately linked to the Being, not to Space.

.
Click to expand...

Imagination within imagination.
Its possible

I agree things are getting more complicated than they should be. Einstein gets so much due attention because he made things simple to understand.
He said "annyone can make things more complicated, but it takes a genius to make complicated things simple". (Paraphrase)
Not to mention he has a history of being right.
My only wish of Einstein is that he would have been a lot more philosophical with his ideas.

The particle accelerator/collider hasnt impressed me much yet. The "God particle" is still a mystery.
We dont really know anything we didnt already know.
I mean we already knew things like spin creates mass, space can exert a force, energy is frequency vibration or spin etc etc
I want to know more...
Like Einstein said, " I want to know the thoughts of God, the rest are details"
lol hey, if you're going to dream--dream big!
 
Last edited:
methamaniac said:
Imagination within imagination.
Its possible

I agree things are getting more complicated than they should be. Einstein gets so much due attention because he made things simple to understand.
He said "annyone can make things more complicated, but it takes a genius to make complicated things simple". (Paraphrase)
Not to mention he has a history of being right.
My only wish of Einstein is that he would have been a lot more philosophical with his ideas.

The particle accelerator/collider hasnt impressed me much yet. The "God particle" is still a mystery.
We dont really know anything we didnt already know.
I mean we already knew things like spin creates mass, space can exert a force, energy is frequency vibration or spin etc etc
I want to know more...
Like Einstein said, " I want to know the thoughts of God, the rest are details"
lol hey, if you're going to dream--dream big!
Click to expand...
Einstein made things MORE complicated, not more simple. If you begin to get into the actuality of Relativity it quickly gets strange. More soon, got to go cook... :D
 
Einstein only has a 'history of being right' because the world of Physics makes everything fit into Special and General Relativity. Quantum Theory only got a crack in the door because Relativity has a gravity problem.

Think about it... Relativity says nothing travels faster than light... except some things do. Relativity says Black Holes totally suck... except they don't - gravity escapes and so does matter. The 'proofs' of Relativity such as Mercury can also be explained by other theories, as can GPS corrections. Frame dragging is one possibility.

Then there is the speed of gravity - nothing travels faster than light... right? So that means Jupiter is orbiting a place where theSun USED TO BE as is earth. We must orbit a place the Sun was about 8.3 minutes ago. For us it's not so bad except for the head spin shit we have to go through to work out why we orbit a place where the Sun ISN'T! But think about Neptune... :D

And if the Micelson-Morley aether actually DOES exist, Relativity is dead in the water.

For that matter, so is the Standard Model of Cosmology AND the Standard Model of Particles has to reboot their theories.
 
^
I know exactly what you are saying.
But it can be "scary" to leave our current picture of reality.
Everything is relative to speed of light is sensible. It puts focus on speed where I believe it should be.

"Nothing"/expansion moves faster than light.
But nothing with mass can outrun light.
Energy of some unknown form (for lack of better word) could certainly outrun it.
In another universe/dimension speed of light could be faster or slower.
If we could see the "other side" of a black hole it would solve a lot. The spinning in and spinng out of a vortex has to be linked to anti matter/
The positive charge going into and a negative charge coming out would create symmetry needed to explain a lot of things.
Give and take-ying and yang-expansion and contraction
 
Last edited:
Tachyons move faster than light. Non-locality is FTL. In some scenarios gravity is FTL. If the Std Model of Particles is anywhere near right, all kinds of particles travel FTL or spin could not be communicated.

The SoL seems not to be an absolute but more an artefact of how we see things. (pun intended)

Even humans seem able to beat the limit with some of the simultaneity events that can't be described in conventional physics but happen anyway.

And remember the 'observer' effect - it might be that what physicists see is solely because they expect to see it. Physics came up with the concept but they are still not applying it to their own field.

And if it's a hologram sitting in a quantum reality, all bets are off... :D
 
Hypothetically, there are lots of things that can travel "faster" than light.
But an observer in our universe is never going to see it. I mean if you could you would predict the future. But how would you ever prove it to yourself? You need light to see anything.
How could you observe something before it is there to observe? You need another "sense".

Non-locality is the smoking gun for existence of other deminsions. We certainly dont need to see them to know they have to exist.
We are stuck in flat land so to speak, but we can use our senses to realize something is "cutting" thru our current dimensions.
At some point you have to step off the train of physics if you want a better view. (David Ash is great at this, albeit a bit "cooky" at times )
If two particles on opposite sides of the universe can comminicate something is connecting them.
And for this "something" speed isnt a problem.
This "something" is probably infinitely fast.
If quantum reality is in fact "real"-
we could all be right lol
Easy to imagine an illusion when your an illusion.
To be more proper,
Easy to imagine imagination with imagination.
 
Last edited:
Ransom itch said:
sorry Willow, I have t say I think you fall in this instance, yours is an intellectually inconsistent reply. The Cosmos is matter, so how did this amazing matter shoot forth into being?
Click to expand...

I'm not sure if you've read the context under which I posted my response. I was talking about the existence of lunar/solar eclipses as witnessed on earth. I don't believe for a second that the universe, our galaxy and our solar system was created with the aim being our witnessing of an essentially meaningless cosmic function. What you have written has no bearing on the subject at that point of the thread.

Your statement still doesn't make a lot of sense in the broader context of this thread. There is nothing really inherent in the universe to prevent matter from organising. It is counter-intuitive but, certainly, it appears to have happened, one way or another. The problem with suggesting that god did this doesn't even begin to approach an answer to these questions. If god did create all, HOW did he do it? Its the same question as "How did the universe begin?"; the difference is purely semantic. Not saying that is what you are saying at all, just that I feel it is implied somewhat in your question... :)

Journyman16 said:
It may be that the matter and energy is simply one manifestation of the Cosmos. After all, what we see and experience is limited not enabled by our senses. String theory seems to rely on 10 dimensions based around a rolled up brane to form the string and we live in 3.
Click to expand...

I think this is a very important point. Everything we can and do know about the universe is only valid or meaningful to the human mind. We can't even really say that the laws of physics are meaningful beyond our view. Perhaps if dolphins had become the 'supreme race' they would have directed their physical probing more in the domain of sound or vibration through medium and came up with different interpretations of cosmic phenomena.

journeyman said:
Personally I don't hold with time being another dimension, I think time is our experience, a moving NOW that lets us experience an apparency of cause and effect, but I'm not wedded to the idea. even so, that's a lot of dimensions we don't experience.
Click to expand...

I guess time does differ dramatically from the other dimensions, in that it is one-way only. However, the existence of entropy seems very temporal and suggests that time is measurable at least...

Then again, doesn't relativity actually state that both time and distance (space) are manifestations of the same intrinsic function?

:)
 
He does. He stores it in the equivaent of a cosmic computer. Not that he needs it, but just in case anyone else does.

You need to be fully prepered to be questioned about the lowest moments of your life and have an answear for it. Otherwise you will be very distressed. It almost killed my grandfather when he got over to the other side and saw what he had done to my grandmother.
 
Ninae - sounds like a hell of a story... (or maybe a heaven of a story :D)

Have you wondered if the 'cosmic computer' is US? Maybe we're here to turn Awareness into Knowledge via experience and it is OUR storage that is the cosmic computer?
 
Ninae said:
He does. He stores it in the equivaent of a cosmic computer. Not that he needs it, but just in case anyone else does.

You need to be fully prepered to be questioned about the lowest moments of your life and have an answear for it. Otherwise you will be very distressed. It almost killed my grandfather when he got over to the other side and saw what he had done to my grandmother.
Click to expand...

Are you referring to the afterlife?
 
Yes.

I think it's more like we're living in a hologram, that's a tecnological invention, and everything is automatically recorded. Like a computer-game.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top