Toilet-Thief
Bluelighter
nevermind
L()()K D()\/\/N |
\/
L()()K D()\/\/N |
\/
Last edited:
Brian Oblivion said:You're argument holds no water.
djfusion777 said:Sure it does- they're not going to make them full strength and far too many side effects would be incurred, just as they are today. Such a product would be watered down, otherwise we'd be able to nip into the pharmacies and buy painkillers tha would floor a gorilla.
They'd be watered down, I can assure you![]()
snakjaw said:I dont think you understand the market. Things which are sold legally simply cannot logically cost more/unit of weight or volume than things which are sold on the black market.
From what they've told us, where illegal drug production appears to be funding terrorism is in the opiate market. I doubt that MDMA production is tied to it at all because it isn't a major blackmarket export product in the middle east.VelocideX said:In relation to the terrorism point, I still think its amusing that all the top world bodies admit that the drug trade funds terrorism to a significant extent... (and organised crime more generally)
You've got two options. Legalise it, and eliminate all profit, or try and ban it, and spend shitloads on enforcement and still not suceed.
Which option would you take? Which do they take?![]()
Brian Oblivion said:earthcentric
Brian Oblivion said:3) So why isn't sugar super expensive?
I totally agree with you. The drug laws actually fuels usage of the substances they are designed to regulate. And results in a market (i.e., a law enforcement market, and an illicit drug market) which is self perpetuating simply due to the laws that are in place.Orpheus420 said:but the very illegal status of the chemical already draws many ignorant, immature and crowd followers to it, a change in the legal status might even further deter the young and too-trendy...