Heroin prescription pilot program reduces crime

peer.review

Bluelighter
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
239
Location
Santa Cruz
Expert in heroin prescribing call

A drugs expert has called for a scheme where addicts are given heroin to be trialled in Scotland.

A pilot project in England indicated that giving addicts heroin in supervised clinics reduced their use of street drugs and reduced crime.

The Scottish Drugs Forum director said the move could help the "Trainspotting generation" of problem drug users.

However, another drugs expert has said services should instead focus on helping addicts come off heroin.

More than 100 users took part in the pilot - part funded by the government - in London, Brighton and Darlington.

About three-quarters of those given heroin were said to have "substantially" reduced their use of street drugs.

The SDF director David Liddell said those results, together with findings from similar schemes in Europe, meant there was now "overwhelming" evidence in favour of having such a project.

He told BBC Radio Scotland's Good Morning Scotland: "We've been very supportive of seeing a Scottish pilot.

"What we're talking about is a very targeted heroin prescribing programme for a very small number of the 50,000 problem drug users who have failed to engage in existing treatment over many years.

“ Start providing people with heroin and their recovery could be a long way down the road ”
Professor Neil McKeganey
"And potentially with this group, you might describe them as the Trainspotting generation, who are actually facing death if they are not provided with appropriate treatment.

"So it is a way of starting the road to recovery and engaging with these hard to reach individuals who otherwise are facing a very bleak future indeed."

Mr Liddell conceded some people would have a moral objection to providing addicts with heroin, and added another issue was the cost of the scheme - about £15,000 per addict per year.

But he insisted: "If we can reduce crime, if we can improve an individual's health and improve their relationships and in the long-term move them very much towards recovery, that's something we should certainly look at."

However, Professor Neil McKeganey, from the Centre for Drug Misuse Research at Glasgow University, argued that drug services should be focused on helping addicts get clean.

'Rightfully cautioned'

Prof McKeganey, also speaking on Good Morning Scotland, said: "Start providing people with heroin and their recovery could be a long way down the road, they may be on that many, many years to come."

He claimed that many doctors were "rightfully very cautious" about giving addicts heroin.

And he argued: "It's enormously expensive, it runs the risk of being a road from which it's very difficult to withdraw - once you start somebody on it it's very difficult to know at what point you can actually bring them back off it."

He claimed Scottish-based research had found that the most effective treatment to get addicts off drugs was residential rehab.

However Prof McKeganey said: "We provide scandalously little of that service in Scotland."

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/8256402.stm

Published: 2009/09/15 10:27:37 GMT

© BBC MMIX
 
yeah its been a great success one of the pilot schemes was near me in darlington the shooting gallery was kinda weird like mind you at a cost of £15000 per year per person with budget cut do you really think uk government will pay for it when other drugs are cheaper
 
Last edited:
There is no way it costs 15k a year per person to run it.

All they need is some security.. a few pharmacists.. and loads of smack..

Wholesale price of heroin is like.. under 500GBP a kilo from source...
 
Naaw thats from the middle east.. prices im sure are actually lower than that.. was in the UN world drug report i think it was..

Why buy from pharma companies? if its more expensive? Are they stupid?

...dont answer that infact xP
 
Yeah there is an obvious reason why the British gov't wouldn't buy illicit heroin. Illicit is cheaper cause they make more. The synthesis stage doesn't cost more either way really inflated prices come from everyone on the chain takingtheir cut obviously.
 
Hopefully one day the world will wake up and if they don't decriminalise or legalise drug use they will atleast have programs like this.

They are taking a lot of money out of the dealers pockets, reducing crime and improving the lifes of drug addicts substantially. Doesn't seem to be much of a downside.
 
Why not just legalize drugs and let addicts worry about supporting their own habits? I guess the UK is a bit different with the NHS, but I can see programs like this causing a lot of resentment among the population. So grandma has to hock her jewelry to buy metformin but johnny the addict gets all the free heroin he wants? Yea...
 
Hopefully one day the world will wake up and if they don't decriminalise or legalise drug use they will atleast have programs like this.

They are taking a lot of money out of the dealers pockets, reducing crime and improving the lifes of drug addicts substantially. Doesn't seem to be much of a downside.

I agree with your sentiments, but the obvious downside to a large majority of the population is that people are still using heroin. For many people, the simple act of injecting/ingesting heroin is intrinsically evil. Such is the result of the endless government propoganda to support the war on drugs.
 
more proof that drugs aren't the cause behind violence and crimes, but the black market that the "war on drugs" has created

good job world governments
 
I agree with your sentiments, but the obvious downside to a large majority of the population is that people are still using heroin. For many people, the simple act of injecting/ingesting heroin is intrinsically evil. Such is the result of the endless government propoganda to support the war on drugs.
well that's what he meant by "population waking up"... it will no longer be intrinsically evil, it will be a medical issue

it is somewhat scary as a med issue, though, because that means that the government can still force you into things """for your own good""", like prison but a little better
 
Top