That is a fair point, and one that is undoubtedly positive for yourself if that is what you choose.
I'm mostly bothered about how that specific study made such a huge error and then gets quoted as a fact. The drug wasn't even the right one...-_-
But I don't blame this on the posters as much as the source still standing upright while talking out of its ass. Still, the Ricuarte study is the worst example by far concerning "mdma" damage. This is why I don't value "sources" as much as the main point; anyone can interpret data to back up a claim and still be completely wrong. It's not just here; I've seen it many times everywhere because a lot of the information out there isn't perfect. Aka misinformation. Anyone can say anything, and then google it to back up what they said. That's a testament to how hard it is to prove something definitively. Especially on the subject of illicit drugs where actually conducting human trials are about as likely as alcohol getting banned.
I have been doing a lot of reading just now and undeniably, as I said, mdma is not harmless. A simple BL search with "Ricuarte" brings up the same argument, largely with the same results which I discovered quite a while ago. There have been other studies too, but by and large they amount to flawed data. There is evidence on both sides. Even so, I would say that in large doses for long periods of time, it will do at least some kind of negative damage, but I am not too sure. Without proper care and lifestyle habits, it can wreck people, however ,that isn't harm exclusively from mdma then. But much of the damage is reversible, especially with abstinence and there is lots of evidence pointing towards people living successful lives and careers despite their abuse. In other words, ultimately the damage being done is very small and when put into perspective, many non-illicit drugs and lifestyle habits (nutrition, exercising, proper sleep, stress, lack of critical thinking activities, trans fats, sugar intake, pollution, aspirin, etc) can do more harm. When you think of all the damage that can be done by just about anything, the argument for mdma damage becomes quite small.
If one were to really go all out, one could make a case that simply waking up and living is neurotoxic and damages the brain. But really, I don't think anyone wants to go there, lol. That pretty much voids any argument.
It's just that mdma is most likely not as harmful as it is being made out to be from certain views/sectors. The extremists come from both sides, but if one acknowledges both arguments, it makes it a lot harder to argue against. When one looks at the raw data, this is rarely done even though that is what makes a study just and compelling; the acknowledgement of errors and variables, especially if they are loaded with them.
Personally, even I know I made a mistake taking mdma so much during a certain period of time...which is exactly why I corrected it but didn't really plaster that part. My period of abuse had a lot more to do with me being self destructive more than enjoying mdma itself; I just wanted to drop and I didn't care about the consequences. I wasn't depressed or trying to escape from anything, I was just caught up in the drug culture; too busy raving, socializing and what not, as well as getting the most I could out of other substances as well.
I became really close with a friend (who later became my gf) during this particular time too, so I can't say I regret it. I also learned a lot from my experiences. And another important thing it did was get out all of the fun I wanted to have; lately most weekends I stay at home with my gf, enjoy some coffee/tea and read or go on my iPad. I rarely party and I don't go all out anymore. It's not because I can't; I just don't want to after what I've done already. It's because deep inside of me, which isn't wholly based on reason, I feel like I have to let go of substance use entirely for myself to live a proper life in the future. You know, the works: career, wife/kids, things like that. I would definitely never have kids and still be a user. I couldn't do that even if every single drug was as harmless as water.
Ah, damn it, I digressed again. But anyway, this study and that one, or whatever, fuck it. Moderation is the key.
Edit: Some fixing.