^^ I am thinking along the same lines. Human stupidity permeates the use of any drug, legal or not. There will always be overdoses, but I think that a governmental policy of education will result in less deaths than one of blind zero tolerance. If people know about the drug and know the concentration of the drug, they're less likely to make stupid mistakes than if they know nothing about it and are unsure as to the concentration of their solution. Undoubtedly the former - regulated supply and education - is far too radical for the rather conservative powers that be to ever accept. But zero tolerance is not practical. I think a midpoint has to be found - forget regulating the drug (thereby leave it illegal) but for gods sake educate people about it.
A friend today suggested (from a completely darwinian perspective) that stopping ambulances attending GHB overdoses for a month, in turn letting several users die, might change things.
I'm by no means in favour of such a radical and inhuman proposition, but I'm sorry to say that I can see where he's coming from.
A friend today suggested (from a completely darwinian perspective) that stopping ambulances attending GHB overdoses for a month, in turn letting several users die, might change things.
I'm by no means in favour of such a radical and inhuman proposition, but I'm sorry to say that I can see where he's coming from.
