• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

Gun Pulled & Man Maced As Neo-Nazi Protestors Surround Family Drag Storytime Event

What’s scary is this is how the average Californian mayo thinks. These kids don’t stand a chance, that’s why it’s on the legislatures to take action. My state recently made it a requirement to be 18 to attend strip clubs or drag shows.
What is a mayo? A progressive leftist Irish-American single/divorced mum?

Children and teens do not belong in strip.clubs, or at drag shows, or LGB pride events. If they want to go to such places or events, they can wait until they are over 18, or 21.
 
arrall is actually very intelligent and mature for his age. and to be fair, I'm a massive fan of the same trans guy you speak of, he's really cool when you get to know him.

i disagree with them on a lot. But that's how it should be. Unlike now, it used to be very normal to be good friends with people you had ideological differences with.

i actually don't think there is THAT much disagreement here... I just think young people on the left feel an overwhelming sense of social pressure to fall in line. I mean that's just how it works now.

Look at the recent incident with the woman from the Young Turks. They are as left as left can be , the wokest of the woke. But she tweeted that she didn't want to be referred to as a "birthing person" or "person who menstruates". She wants to be called a woman. And now her world is falling apart:


Last time I checked she was still holding her ground. But make no mistake, she will either walk her comment back and apologize or their youtube empire will come crashing down. Those are the two options.
I have friends who are on the right of the political spectrum (used to be more, but some went QAnon 😕) and we’ve always had a good time debating politics. Politely, like normal people. Ironically, some of them became more left over time due to Jan 6 and I became a bit LESS left as I became disenfranchised by the Dems. So we’ve both drifted closer to the middle.

About Gen Z, I find it bemusing how intense they are about socio-political issues. When I was that age, I was more concerned with having a good time than politics; in fact, considering who my dad is, I was shockingly ignorant of most of the issues, as a teenager/young adult. But I think the world has become a darker, scarier place; perhaps the young people feel that there is more at stake? Idk…I’m not a member of the TikTok generation so I can’t really comment 🤷🏻‍♀️
 

Chud

Urban Dictionary
https://www.urbandictionary.com › define › term=chud



A unattractive person whose defining characteristic of their personality is their egotism. Most often used to describe typically one-dimensional person.

In reality it’s Chad + stud = chud

You're both wrong!

966193_poster_scale_480x640.jpg
 
so then if it's adult-themed, which it is, should it be presented to young children?

absolutely NOT

and i think you're a poopy head if you think it is appropriate for children
Yeah, drag shows, drag queens, and their sexual humour are for adults only. Not teens, and not children.

Someone else wrote how drag queens reading a book to children in a library is akin to someone wearing a Mickey mouse costume or dressing up like speed racer, or Batman. This is not the same as many if not most drag queens dress like hookers/prostitutes/tarts, have bawdy or sexually suggestive names-one friend sometimes appears at holiday parties with other adult drag queens as Debbie Delicious, or another is Kayte Tukserdyck when she goes to drag/TV bars with other friends who dress up, and some drag queens sing songs about sex, but as I wrote before it is for adults only.

It does seem as though the various "leaders" of drag queen story time, some supposed drag queens who volunteer to dress in character, and even supposed "leaders" of the LGB/LGBT 'community' are not actually gay, bisexual, lesbian, or transsexual/transgender men or women but are pedophiles and child/teen sex abusers.

I am not writing that someone who is gay/homosexual/lesbian, bisexual, or trans is a pedophile. If someone is actually LGBT, or heterosexual and an adult they are not going to be a paedophile or into sexually abusing children or people under age 18 at all.

In the 1980s and even 1990s the paedophile group NAMBLA aligned itself with LGB rights, LGB pride events, etc. This was not some rare or isolated event. I was there and while everyone who is LGB and not a paedophile at all found it disgusting and distasteful there were well known LGB "leaders", famous or well known people who were either paedophiles such as Allen Ginsburg, Harry Hay, or advocated for NAMBLA and legalizing sexual abuse of teens and children such as Pat Califia, Gayle Rubin, Dan Savage, Gus Van Zandt, and others.



 
Why are there LGBT flags hung up in the room in a lot of pics I've seen if it's not supposed to be sexually suggestive?
 
Why are there LGBT flags hung up in the room in a lot of pics I've seen if it's not supposed to be sexually suggestive?
Which rooms? In bars or a business? Or in classrooms?

I had teachers who were gay, lesbian, and bisexual. None of them ever put any sort of LGB/LGBT rainbow flag up-it was not invented then but even if it had been around and popular they would not have done this-and it was well known that they are LGB but they never discussed their personal lives with students at all. My teachers who are heterosexual did not discuss their personal lives with students either.

At least one drag queen is based and admits that children do not belong at and should not be participating in drag shows at all.

 
I’ve never seen evidence of this one, can you please share it?

A person who is 24 or in early/mid 20s having sex with someone who is not 18, is illegal, and it does not matter about state/provincial "age of consent" laws.
 
Seems like a tempest in a teapot to me. Most people aren't going to bring their kids to this kind of thing. In the case of those that will, you're not going to keep those parents from exposing their kids to "trans ideology" or whatever by banning drag queens from holding these events at libraries.
 
Before the TRA movement, trans people were already out there, nobody talked about it. They were probably already reading stories to children and working in libraries, and no one cared. Now the TRA movement has aggressively promoted it, along with drag queens who moonlight in children's story time but actually work the adult nightlife circuit.

So my short answer is... no, I would have no problem with a trans person doing story hour. I think it should just be "story hour" and we don't need to advertise the fact that they're trans, anymore than we should have a "gay person" story hour, or "lesbian" story hour. If they can dress like a normal person and don't work in the adult entertainment industry, then I think it would be as acceptable as anyone else doing it.

If the goal is equality and equity then they need to stop with the power tripping and making everything about an agenda. It is so forced, aggressive, alienating, and it's offending the very people who they are trying to win over.

Gay rights took decades. Same-sex marriage took a couple of decades of some really solid public debate. Eventually, the majority of the public was won over and now it's a historical footnote. But the TRA movement has been extremely forceful and this has all been rushed through in literally the past 5 years. It's too fast. It's not giving people time to talk about it, adjust to the idea, and to disseminate education. It's also almost completely divorced from science, and that is the #1 problem with it. The way children are being targeted for transition has no long-term scientific studies, and the whole medical industry around that is precisely why something as benign as library story time is not trusted, because it looks like indoctrination.

TRAs are trying to make being "born trans" en par to being "born gay" when we know from all the psychiatry data that trans people are not nature, they're nurture. And because it's nurture, parents are rightfully suspicious of all this grooming and indoctrination. It's so, so intense, meanwhile trans people are a very small portion of the population. It's so overblown.

They are violently censoring and doxxing anybody who disagrees with them, even others in the LGB community. It has to stop. I would be less against story time if they weren't destroying people's lives for simply questioning it, and if they would stop trying to confuse children about their gender identity. These are not issues that most children would even think about if they weren't prompted to.

Good post. The radical left, and the media that pushes, or perhaps even creates, that narrative, have gone way too far in their approach. I'm glad that we are talking about transgenderism, because it is a thing and has been a thing since time immemorial, long before this current movement. Just like the push for equal rights and social acceptance of homosexuality, this needed to happen. But what is also needed is open and respectful discourse, and an acceptance that it is going to be difficult for many people who the whole concept had just never been part of their world. The correct way to handle it would have been to counter criticism with calm and respectful counterarguments (I mean of course if neo-Nazis are pulling guns, that's a different story, but this discussion really isn't about what the OP references, it's about the broader cultural discussion). Instead, the media, and also certain individuals among the trans rights activists, have decided to take the approach of "we're here, fuck you, if you don't accept everything we say, you're a piece of shit bigot". That kind of approach will never in a million years win anyone over to your side. It just creates resentment, and pushes many people who were never hateful, just confused and uncomfortable but could have been willing to engage in discourse, over to the side of "OMG trans people are trying to make it so it's legal to have sex with children", simply because those people have had hate and insults hurled at them.

Of course the radical right does similar stuff, look at the shit Fox News spews out about liberals. But two wrongs don't make a right.

Furthermore, this constant pushing of transgender ideology in the way it's being done (and this is just my opinion, and I do not mean to offend anyone) is having an effect on young people. I am not going to speculate on whether it's intentional or not, but from what I can see, it has become "cool" to be gender non-conforming. Teenagers and young adults have always, for all time, and will always be confused and seeking to develop their identity. I remember, it was a confusing and difficult time. All teenagers get depressed, hormones are a hell of a drug. But what I am seeing is that there are a lot of young people who are coming out as transgender, or pangender (both genders), or whatever, and it seems to me that it is the modern version of how all of us experimented with our identities when we were young, to try to fit in, to try something new, or as a way to try to figure out why we feel uncomfortable in our own self-image. I certainly did it. I became a "goth kid" for a while in high school. Then I became a "psychedelic guy", psychedelics were my identity. It wasn't until my early 30s that I started to feel comfortable in my own skin and to know who I was, and to no longer let pressures from outside forces question my sense of self.

To be clear, I have no problem with young people trying out the persona of being trans. But my worry is that the idea of hormones and transition surgery is being pushed everywhere. And there seem to be a LOT of young people suddenly becoming trans. It has never been common for people to truly feel they're the wrong gender, there always have been, and I am fully aware that many of them, in the past, were just never willing to make that transition, either due to self-hatred or fear of others. But it's clearly a fad now, and my worry is that taking hormones and getting surgery are steps that have lifelong consequences. I worry that young people, who are not developed enough in their identities, will jump on that train, and later on it will lead to a great deal of suffering, because you can't go back from that. Of course, for some, who aren't doing it because it's a fad, but because they feel they can finally come out, it will be great, and I am very happy for them that they're able to do that, and that is an example of good coming from this.

Overall I see both sides and am conflicted, but I think the way in which his has been rolled out is troubling.

That picture is SICK & anyone who thinks that is ok is mentally ill & I would say is really into loving kids in a very illegal way. Would you send a young kid to a GG Allin concert if he was still alive? NO you wouldn't FFS is the answer.

That picture is absolutely sick, and I would be very surprised if anyone posting in here does not agree with that. Of course, some people in the world would call you a bigot for saying that, which is part of the point I was making above.
 
A person who is 24 or in early/mid 20s having sex with someone who is not 18, is illegal, and it does not matter about state/provincial "age of consent" laws.

are you talking about some federal age of consent? in the u.s. there is no federal age of consent - it's set at the state level.

there are age-related federal laws e.g. 18 U.S. Code § 2423 - Transportation of minors which makes it illegal to transport a minor across state lines with the intent of engaging in criminal sexual acts.

perhaps that is what you're thinking of? that is one of the federal crimes of which matt gaetz, for example, is suspected.

but state consent laws absolutely matter. all states have an unrestricted age of consent and many also have one or more restricted age(s) of consent. so, for example, in ohio the restricted by authority age of consent is 16 so your 24 year old could have sex with a 16 year old - quite legally - as long as the older partner is not in a position of trust or authority.

i'm not saying i think it's right. or appropriate. or whatever.

i am saying it's not illegal.

alasdair
 
to put it bluntly - if you're a dude, dressing up as a woman, it's because you wanna be fucked by another dude - unless it's Halloween

other than Halloween, what other reason are you doing that for?

tell me


so yes - it's got everything to do with sex
It's like flashing, they get off on doing it in front of children. Mother of a 4 year old here that has 2 lesbian Grandmas. No real parent supports this bullshit, it's sick. Gays Against Groomers is the real deal.
 
@arrall

You're being a bit selective with your quoting there, me thinks. I don't think the single sentence you chopped out of that article proves anything of the sort.

I don't know who the fuck this guy is, but his message (whatever it happens to be) is mixed at best..

GNR said:
When I was 14 I had a very satisfying sexual relationship with a 24-year-old man... I was hard to resist.

Dan Savage said:
As a grown-up, I refuse to shove those early beneficial sexual experiences down the ol’ memory hole... It seems to me that so long as the older, more experienced person in an April-June romance is kind and sensitive–and doesn’t mislead the teenager about the long-term prospects (nil)–there’s not much cause for outrage... The man to whom you lost your virginity, GNR, sounds like a nice guy, almost the Platonic ideal of a first sex partner. (If only everyone’s first lover came with a required-reading list!) You were lucky to find him. He, on the other hand, was lucky too–lucky that he didn’t get caught.

You chopped out literally the only sentence in the whole article that indicates he's against adults fucking teenagers. It strikes me as a mandatory disclaimer. There are so many red flags in that article.

Did you honestly read the whole thing and not think WTF is with this guy?

The 14 year old's pedo was a "nice guy" and the kid was lucky to find him?

Seriously. What the actual fuck?!?

If you're 24 years old and you fuck a 14 year old, you are a big steaming pile of shit.
 
Xorkoth said:
I would be very surprised if anyone posting in here does not agree with that.

Yeah, me too. In fact I'm certain we are all in agreement. I think the whole world is pretty much in agreement on this. Maybe a very, very small percent of Australians (who aren't pedos) would approve of kids shoving notes in some creeps underwear... but I kind of doubt it? I've never had a conversation in my entire life with anyone who indicated that sort of shit is okay.

ITT: everyone agrees about everything, pretty much.

There is some casual bigotry, but I've come to expect that pretty much everywhere.

I'm not afraid of my kid going to drag story time, because I would be there with them the whole time so there is zero chance of them being groomed or molested. If anything inappropriate happened, I would interrupt the show and call the police... I'm not going to take my daughter to that sort of thing, though, because I don't see any benefit. I don't want to normalize transgender shit. Puberty is confusing enough without all that nonsense.

If I did take her (and nothing weird happened), I'm sure she'd have fun. She likes costumes. She likes stories. It's a no-brainer.

I'm not pro drag queen story time, but I'm not anti drag queen story time either (assuming it is all above board). If someone wants to take their kid there, so be it. I disagree, but who am I to tell them how to raise their kids?

I don't think kids should be indoctrinated into mainstream religions (or cults) either... nor do I think it is healthy for kids to play extremely violent video games.

I like sex. I don't think it's anything to be ashamed of. I don't think nudity is traumatic.

I'm taking my daughter to a hippy festival in a couple of weeks. She will see a lot of dicks. She sees my dick all the time. I don't hide it from her. Why would I?

I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything, here. Do what you want with your kids. I have my own approach, but I don't presume to know all the answers.
 
Mr. Krinkle said:
to put it bluntly - if you're a dude, dressing up as a woman, it's because you wanna be fucked by another dude - unless it's Halloween

other than Halloween, what other reason are you doing that for?

tell me

I don't see any difference between a man "dressing like a woman" and a woman dressing like a woman.

I mean: female clothing (and make-up) is often sexualized, regardless of who is wearing it. Right?

Sometimes - personally - I think women are dressed inappropriately around children. I don't want to see my auntie's cleavage.

If you're a woman and you wear a g-string, woohoo! But if you're a guy and you wear a g-string, you're a creep / laughing stock / whatever.

Women can wear men's clothes. No problem. But a man wearing women's clothing? Must be a pervert!

Wearing women's clothing can be liberating, simply because we're not supposed to do it.

If somebody tells me not to do something, I'm going to do it (assuming I don't hurt anyone in the process) because life is short and I don't want to live however many years I have on this planet in fear.

I assume "tell me" was intended to be rhetorical and all of that is going to make zero sense to you... but there you go.
 
Electrum1 said:
Why are there LGBT flags hung up in the room in a lot of pics I've seen if it's not supposed to be sexually suggestive?

How is a flag sexually suggestive?

I gather from some of the comments on this thread that certain members would rather live in a world without gay and lesbian people.

I know a guy who runs the music department at a prominent Catholic school. He wears a couple of rainbow badges on his lapel. He's proud of who he is. Why shouldn't he be?

Nobody has a problem with teachers talking about husbands / wives if they're straight, so why should teachers have to hide the fact that they're gay?
 
Top