• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion

    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Pissed_and_messed | Shinji Ikari

Gibberings CLVIV: Micro-Dick Wanking

Marmalade said:
The sharing of data will make fuck all difference to the efficiency of dealing with an individuals dilemma. It's really only for bigger stuff, like if you've been in an accident or whatever.
Click to expand...

How do you know that the better sharing of data wouldn't have affected my situation? I quite strongly believe it would.

Whether the much-discussed proposed upgrade would actually deliver is moot; what I'm saying is that people confronted with such situations on a regular / semi-regular basis would be massively relieved if it did.

Marmalade said:
It will not affect a Robocunt Secretary, and the limits of her position (or attitude) towards you. There will be no magic formula integrating the two systems that auto springs up a solution to Robocunt for yours (and others) general day to day dilemma's about app scheduling. It wont create more appointments.
Click to expand...

Robocunt secretary? Steady on. 8(

I like the staff at both my local practice and the mental health clinic. I understand the difficulties they face. I respect them for doing their jobs.

My sister is one such 'robocunt secretary' (if you will - that's not her job title, surprisingly), and I've listened to her frustrations with the current system on many an occasion. Even the slightest upgrade would make things much easier for both staff and patients, save a lot of time and stress on both sides and cut waste enormously.

I'm not naive enough to believe either the scaremongers or those you choose to portray as 'Mr and Mrs Average'. I'm skeptical by nature, and that works both ways.
 
Last edited:
At the same time, there's a knee-jerk default 'leftist' reaction to such news items which is often just as distorted as the picture presented by mainstream media. The Robotic Left, they're called, and you can read them even more easily than the 'general public'.

In any case, what was mentioned in passing as part of a wider moan about the absurdity of NHS beaureaucracy seems to have become the crux of the issue, which is something I can't really be arsed with.

Just off to sell my data round the corner.
 
Sammy G said:
How do you know that the better sharing of data wouldn't have affected my situation? I quite strongly believe it would.

Whether the much-discussed proposed upgrade would actually deliver is moot; what I'm saying is that people confronted with such situations on a regular / semi-regular basis would be massively relieved if it did.
Click to expand...
Two conflicting statements, but no matter ... please tell me how the sharing of the data would positively have affected your situation ... since you STRONGLY believe it would.


How, please. Details?

IF it did is irrelevant, it's whether it will or not. It wont.
 
In one statement, I talk about "the better sharing of data". Better sharing of data would help the NHS.

In the second, I refer specifically to "the proposed upgrade". The proposed upgrade may or may not help the NHS.

The first is referring to a principle, the second to the actual system which is being implemented. The distinction's pretty clear, I reckon, but still...

Marmalade said:
IF it did is irrelevant, it's whether it will or not. It wont.
Click to expand...

Okay. Fair enough.
 
Sammy G said:
At the same time, there's a knee-jerk default 'leftist' reaction to such news items which is often just as distorted as the picture presented by mainstream media. The Robotic Left, they're called, and you can read them even more easily than the 'general public'.
Click to expand...

My own opinion is not political, altho I can see why its convenient for fobbing it off as such. I'm neither left or right.

MY opinion is based on 25 years of dealing with the miniscule problems like your appointment dilema presented, as well as much more serious ones, consistently for 25 years.

I have the experience of knowing how problematic the most simple things go wrong both in a hospital inpatient and outpatient scenario, as well as at your GPs, and ESPECIALLY the problems that generate from between them both having to communicate with one another.

I have no idea if this was originally a labour policy, or a tory one, and I care not a fuck about that part.
 
So I ask again ... you made a bold statement

Sammy G said:
How do you know that the better sharing of data wouldn't have affected my situation? I quite strongly believe it would.
Click to expand...

Then please quantify that with why, and how this will be the case.

I assume since you think strongly about it you can at least explain why and demonstrate how it will be improved
 
Sammy G said:
The Robotic Left, they're called,
Click to expand...

Really? By who?

I had to google that. I got just THREE hits that didn't refer to robotic arms or arterial problems.

Of these three hits, two were from old Australian blogs and one was from a God/Christian website.

You're turning into Peter Hitchens.
 
In my mind, it's not even a labour or tory or liberal press issue anyway. That's just Bluntsie style tactics to deflect from the issue (that Sam is so vehemently sure would have improved his appointment dilemma today). I can swear to having never read an article in the Guardian about it. And believe me, it would make my own life so much easier if it would actually improve simple, basic problems that I have to face all the time, almost everyday.

I just know the daily problems well, I know the transitional issues between being an in and out patient. I understand the difficulty between being treated at your GPs, for results needed by a different hospital. I WANT to believe what Sam is saying when he states he strongly KNOWS his dilemma today would have been improved by the changes and sharing option. I'd just like to know HOW.

I'm confident he's got the answers for me tho, which is kick-ass cos then I can stress a little less in life about such things.
 
Last edited:
article-1192859-005A1BB800000258-597_468x294.jpg
 
Hey, just to demo your inconsistency, I can go look back on your posts (ermmm think it was Myshkins, you've had so many names now) .. but back to last year when you were crying and stressing about missing your blood app because of your heroin problem ... and I can find the post where you agreed with me about Robocunt secretaries making your life difficult regarding you missing an appointment?

I can do that for you ... to show you how much you've 'developed' ... it was the same time when SHM pulled you up on it, while I was giving you some understanding empathy about how life is difficult etc etc, and poor you, I can empathise with your situation... but you blamed me for his astuteness ... just before you went apeshit and didn't want to talk to me anymore because big, bad SHM had hit the nail on your retardedly arrogant head so accurately it HURT.

Just say the word and I'll go and look for the quotes
 
AND then, the funniest thing ... you defriended me on the forum, thinking I'd even notice (lol, friends list is serious biznizz, y0) ... sent me a text to try to get me to realise such, which went straight over my head cos it was too retarded to comprehend ... and 5 minutes later said you were sowwy and could you be my friend again

What a joke.

ak0XkXC.jpg


In before Albion 'tightwhites' you.
 
Prescott is about the only politician of the last 15 years or so that i have liked, the last of the breed of politicians that seemed to have any noticeable personality about them. Im sure he must have 'had something' on Tony Blair, they way Blair was allways so loyal to him, and Prescott allways kept his deputy PM job despite all his gaffs. He only finally lost his job on the same day that Gordon Brown defeated Blair for the prime ministership.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top