Hammilton
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2008
- Messages
- 3,435
On the subject of fusel oil constitutents, furfural was the most interesting to me. I'm wondering how this is metabolized? Does this open up like GBL does?
I don't think it does, but I dunno. According to wikipedia, consumption produces euphoria, dizziness, headache, etc- the typical results of ethanol consumption.
It's similar to GBL, but the difference is important; this won't become GHB, obviously. So basically: is the intoxication due to furfural itself or a metabolite?
Second, I received some private communication regarding delta-hexachlorocyclohexane, and it got my interest. According to CTD, it interacts with the following genes:
Main
GABRG2 GABRA1 GABRB1 GABRB2
Less
SHGB STAR AR CAT ESR1 ESR2
I'm familiar with the first four, but the last six are meaningless to me. No idea what they are, but given the degree of interaction, I don't think they're relevant.
There are a whole mix of isomers of this substance, but the one of importance is delta, it seems. I believe this is the most potent, and apparently the least likely to cause cancer. Still: don't perceive my interest as a reason to take this drug. I can't think of a worse idea.
I'm pretty sure that it's very similar to benzodiazepines in effect, and I found a paper describing it as "very potent" in this respect, but I seem to have irrepairably lost it.
I don't think it does, but I dunno. According to wikipedia, consumption produces euphoria, dizziness, headache, etc- the typical results of ethanol consumption.
It's similar to GBL, but the difference is important; this won't become GHB, obviously. So basically: is the intoxication due to furfural itself or a metabolite?
Second, I received some private communication regarding delta-hexachlorocyclohexane, and it got my interest. According to CTD, it interacts with the following genes:
Main
GABRG2 GABRA1 GABRB1 GABRB2
Less
SHGB STAR AR CAT ESR1 ESR2
I'm familiar with the first four, but the last six are meaningless to me. No idea what they are, but given the degree of interaction, I don't think they're relevant.
There are a whole mix of isomers of this substance, but the one of importance is delta, it seems. I believe this is the most potent, and apparently the least likely to cause cancer. Still: don't perceive my interest as a reason to take this drug. I can't think of a worse idea.
I'm pretty sure that it's very similar to benzodiazepines in effect, and I found a paper describing it as "very potent" in this respect, but I seem to have irrepairably lost it.

