• 🇳🇿 🇲🇲 🇯🇵 🇨🇳 🇦🇺 🇦🇶 🇮🇳
    Australian & Asian
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • AADD Moderators: Tronica

Former Supreme Court judge Ken Crispin - Legalise

bit_pattern

Ex-Bluelighter
Joined
Oct 17, 2008
Messages
8,127
A transcript from the 7:30 Report, thought it was worth sharing, some very interesting insights into sentencing and the emotions that a judge goes through in the court room.

http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2010/s2911436.htm

Here's a teaser, follow the link for the full interview

You look at people who have a long history of drug addiction and they will, inevitably, be driven to keep committing crimes whilst ever they're drug addicted. What they really need is to whole heartedly embrace a rehabilitation program.

They are not going to get that in prison so, you send somebody to prison knowing full well that the underlying problem of addiction is not going to be addressed and sooner or later they're gonna come out and they're gonna commit more offences because of that problem. On the other hand, if you send them off to a rehabilitation place they may go in the front door and walk out the back door and go and commit more offences anyway.

So you're constantly torn between the two options. Do I put this person in prison and protect the community from his or her behaviour for a period time? Or, do I try to go down a more therapeutic process that may, on the one hand irritate the law and order brigade, but on the other hand might ultimately provide a long term solution.
 
Good to see some judges with common sense.

Quote: "What courts essentially do is cause harm to somebody else, that is, the defendant".

I couldn't have put it better myself.
 
Top