johnboy
Bluelight Crew
originally posted by Chemical Generation in the closed thread http://www.bluelight.ru/ubb/Forum10/HTML/000952.html?reload=37 reposted here with permission.
Glad to see that everyone is reading/responding, and most importantly THINKING and QUESTIONNING.
With regards to Ketamine, no tests developed yet. I will be working on that soon. Some others we are working on should also help everyone get better informed about their party supplies!
E2 is not selling as an independant entity yet. We are currently developing a marketing strategy, which will probably involve several steps. Firstly handing a few out to test the market and gather feedback. Volunteers welcome to contact us, but please be aware that we're looking for people with a particular pill/compound available, that we may be able to help identify using E2. It's not a 'who wants one' grab at this stage!
Marquis reagent and E2 are definitely the best things to happen to the scene in a long time. And a bargain at AUD20 (+GST). We will always need to work hard to keep one step ahead of those that would otherwise try to rip us off or make us sick, whilst profiting hugely. It then becomes necessary for YOU to let people like ME know what THEY are doing, so that we can find a way to counteract it.
As for Saffrole and other precursors (starting materials) such as piperonal, used for MDMA synthesis, it should be no surprise that they give similar reactions with Marquis reagent, as they ARE very similar to MDMA! Again, the reagent is not selective, and if it's structurally similar it will give a similar result. On the other hand, because it is NOT selective, things that are NOT structurally similar can also give similar results. Hence the need to develop more discriminating tests.
I regret that I can't inform you all of the scientific literature references that I use for Marquis and other testers. This is primarily due to me wanting to avoid any unscrupulous manufacturers from learing what other chemicals thay could use to get the blue/purple/black response. Sory folks, as a scientist I know that you have to base your reputation on facts and literature, without which you are just making unfounded/unsubstantiated claims.
Unfortunately, with the scene and the audience the way it is, I feel that it would be detrimental to us all. Your understanding in this matter would be greatly appreciated!
To give you some insight into the chemistry behind my call on the PMA colour:
The issue of PMA not responding positively to Marquis is interesting (well, I thought so!). Remember above that I spoke of the Marquis reagents response moving to the red end of the visible spectrum as the ratio of Carbon/Hydrogen to Oxygen rises. Remember also that Speed is at the red end of the spectrum, which is also what I will call the 'weak' end of the spectrum. ie: Not much around to cause a colour reaction. Note that PMA is fairly similar in structure to Speed, so it is also, at best, going to be at the weak end of the spectrum. Now consider that there's no methyl group on the nitrogen for PMA (METhamphetmamine is Speed, para-methoxyamphetamine is PMA), and that the methoxy group is on the opposite site of the aromatic ring, and relatively easily cleaved off with concentrated sulphuric acid. From all of this chemistry I summise it's not likely to give a strong reaction to Marquis, if at all. My references say it doesn't react except to give effecvescence, which is interesting in itself. Effervescence in a pill can be due to the sulphuric acid reacting with calcium carbonate to give carbon dioxide gas. People also press pills with magnesium oxide, which doesn't do that gas prodcution thing, so it's hard to draw a conclusion about that side of it.
Anyhow, rambled enough. Onwards and upwards.
B.
Chemical Generation