rickolasnice
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2007
- Messages
- 6,810
I disagree with this point. To say science doesn't also require faith is completely bogus... how many of us have personally attempted to prove or disprove the theory of relativity? What about any other major theories/ scientific "facts?"
We believe what we read in scientific journals, simply because of the word "scientific." It requires faith in science; men in white lab coats are becoming the new clergy. Contrary to popular belief, science can lie. Variables are constantly manipulated to prove the point the scientist wants to prove. We know little more about the "big questions" than we used to; in a way, science is just making things more complicated.
Sometimes when studying complex scientific ideas I believe more in a divine being. How could something like evolution produce such a complex system, such as the human eye, starting from what was once a single celled organism?
To a certain extent, reading scientific journals etc does require some level of faith.. but it's more a faith in the human race.. Especially when you bring in peer reviews.
And seriously? You don't believe in evolution. The complex system of an eye took millions of years.. Starting with photo-sensitive cells, adding in a lense and then an apateur pupil..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ybWucMx4W8
If evolution isn't real.. why do we have vestigial genes?
There is also evidence through observation:
http://news.nationalgeographic.co.uk/news/2008/04/080421-lizard-evolution.html
And you only have to look through the fossil records to see an almost step by step of one animal evolving into another.
Last edited: