• ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️



    Film & Television

    Welcome Guest


    ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️
  • ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️
    Forum Rules Film Chit-Chat
    Recently Watched Best Documentaries
    ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️
  • Film & TV Moderators: ghostfreak

Film: King Kong (2005)

Rate it

  • [img]http://i.bluelight.ru/g//543/1star.gif[/img]

    Votes: 2 6.7%
  • [img]http://i.bluelight.ru/g//543/2stars.gif[/img]

    Votes: 1 3.3%
  • [img]http://i.bluelight.ru/g//543/3stars.gif[/img]

    Votes: 5 16.7%
  • [img]http://i.bluelight.ru/g//543/4stars.gif[/img]

    Votes: 12 40.0%
  • [img]http://i.bluelight.ru/g//543/5stars.gif[/img]

    Votes: 10 33.3%

  • Total voters
    30

Banquo

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Dec 6, 1999
Messages
5,701
Location
USA
Film: King Kong - UPDATE: Trailer released

looking forward to this...

===

A Big Gorilla Weighs In

By SHARON WAXMAN
New York Times
(edited)

LOS ANGELES, Oct. 26 - In hiring Peter Jackson, the Oscar-winning director of the "Lord of the Rings" trilogy, to remake the monster classic "King Kong," Universal Pictures took a daring leap, paying him $20 million to direct, produce and be the co-writer of the film.

With seven weeks to go before the movie's release, the risks are becoming clearer. After seeing a version of the film in late September at Mr. Jackson's studio in New Zealand, Universal executives agreed to release "King Kong" at a length of three hours.

The film is substantially longer than Universal had anticipated and presents dual obstacles: the extra length has helped increase the budget by a third, to $207 million, while requiring the studio, owned by General Electric, to reach for the kind of long-term audience interest that made hits out of three-hour movies like "Titanic" and the films in Mr. Jackson's "Rings" trilogy.

Hollywood blockbusters have increasingly relied on big releases that bring in as much as half of their ticket sales on the first weekend. But long films receive far fewer showings per day, and the most successful ones, like "Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring" (2001) by Mr. Jackson, which took in $315 million at the domestic box office for New Line Cinema, have remained in theaters for well over half a year.

The film industry and Universal could use a big seller.

Asked about the length of "King Kong," Universal executives said they saw it as an advantage in an era when jaded moviegoers are hungering for something extraordinary.

"This is a three-hour feast of an event," said Marc Shmuger, vice chairman of Universal Pictures, who described the film as a tragic love story between the ape and Naomi Watts, who plays Ann Darrow, an actress. "I've never come close to seeing an artist working at this level."

Set for release on Dec. 14, "King Kong" retells the classic beauty-and-the-beast tale first filmed in 1933, with its lasting image of Kong atop the Empire State Building, and remade in 1976. Along with Ms. Watts, it stars Jack Black, Adrien Brody and a 25-foot, computer-animated gorilla.

This time around, the picture depends upon another oversize talent in the person of Mr. Jackson, who was granted an unusual degree of control at a time when studios are trimming costs and tightening their grips on most productions. Not only did Mr. Jackson produce and direct, and also write with his longtime partner, Fran Walsh, and Philippa Boyens, but his companies Weta Digital and Weta Workshop also created the physical and computer special effects in the film at Mr. Jackson's studio in New Zealand.

"I anticipated it would be long, but not this long," the Universal chairwoman, Stacey Snider, said. As recently as late September, she expected about two hours and 40 minutes, she said. But on Wednesday she expressed delight with the picture she's got: "This is a masterpiece. I can't wait to unveil it."

The increased length, Ms. Snider said, means that the movie will cost $32 million more than planned, adding to expenses that had already gone up $25 million from an original $150 million production budget.

Who will pay for these budget overruns has been the subject of intense negotiations over the last two weeks, with representatives of the studio and the director haggling over who was responsible, according to those involved in the negotiations.

Ms. Snider said that as of Wednesday, all had been resolved, with the studio more or less splitting the $32 million expense with Mr. Jackson.

In an e-mail message, Mr. Jackson appeared to disagree, saying instead that he would be paying for those expenditures, which were mainly associated with extra digital-effects shots. Referring to his partner, Ms. Walsh, Mr. Jackson wrote: "Since Fran and I believed in the three-hour cut and wanted to take responsibility for the extra length, we offered to pay for these extra shots ourselves. That's what we're doing." He did not say how much that would be, but said the extra effects shot would cost "considerably below $32 million."

A spokesman for Universal responded, "We are working together to cover overages."

In granting Mr. Jackson immense latitude, Universal relied not just on his skills, but also a huge fan base, much of which has followed the production through the director's frequent communications on a Web site, www.kongisking.net.

But few elements of the film have been seen by the larger public, and even Universal executives saw a finished version of King Kong's face - with its expressive eyes, broadly fierce nose and mane of computer-generated hair - only in recent days.

A spokeswoman for NBC Universal said Bob Wright, the chairman, has been told of the rising cost and length of "King Kong." "Bob is more than aware of what is going on with this production and other major productions, and he has enormous confidence in the leadership team at Universal Studios," said the spokeswoman, Anna Perez.

Ms. Snider said she did not think the three-hour length would be an obstacle for moviegoers. Three-hour epics, she said, are Mr. Jackson's "brand."

Exhibitors have long complained that very long films make it harder to draw audiences, though in this difficult year at the box office, they have complained louder about not having enough good films to show. Paul Dergarabedian, president of Exhibitor Relations, which tracks the box office for theater owners, agreed that long movies posed problems. "But if it's a really fine film, it won't be a detriment to its success," he said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/27/m...=1130385600&partner=homepage&pagewanted=print
 
Last edited:
Jack Black is in it, so I guess I am obligated to go.... but this looks really weak....
 
Weta workshop is pretty capable, and Jackson seems to know what it takes to make a good film. With a budget of over 200 mil, I expect a totally engrossing film that excels in technical achievement and the use of computer graphics. Physical human actors will necessarily be forced into a supporting role, since the story is really about King Kong, and the only other lynchpin role is being covered by Naomi Watts, who almost always delivers.

It will really come down to how the story is presented, if Jackson can be objective enough to trim away extraneous material and make a good, compelling story that doesn't drag. I'll definitely check it out.
 
WHAT WHAT WHAT!?!?!?
Universal is owned by General Electric????????
CHEESE AND RICE.... This world is going down the toilet. No Wonder movies have gotten so shitty, theyve become a part of the McDonalization of the whole world. All they care about is making money, not making good movies. Does any1 else see a huge problem with this?
 
Tanuki_23 said:
WHAT WHAT WHAT!?!?!?
Universal is owned by General Electric????????
CHEESE AND RICE.... This world is going down the toilet. No Wonder movies have gotten so shitty, theyve become a part of the McDonalization of the whole world. All they care about is making money, not making good movies. Does any1 else see a huge problem with this?

It's nothing new in the movie industry. From the very beginning, in th 1910s with the original Motion Picture Patent Company and Biograph, the principal aim of filmmaking was financial gain. There's always been a tension between the artistic and business aspects of the movie industry. But neither one will ever be able to completely dominate. You'll always have crappy big budget studio productions, and you'll have indie films, and you'll other films that run the gamut between these two extremes. Just because Universal is behind a project does not mean that the finished product will inevitably be some commercialized worthless piece of crap.

The good thing about NBC merging with Universal is that Conan O'Brien started showing clips of Walker Texas Ranger on Late Night.
 
WacoWas AnAccident said:
It will really come down to how the story is presented, if Jackson can be objective enough to trim away extraneous material and make a good, compelling story that doesn't drag. I'll definitely check it out.

trim away extraneous material? it's more than an hour longer than the original.
 
I am really looking forward to seeing this.... DESPITE the inclusion of Jhack Blhack.
 
michael said:
trim away extraneous material? it's more than an hour longer than the original.

We are well acquainted with your opinion on Jackson's filmmaking skills, michael. However, it is unwise to judge something before you've seen it. Just because it's an hour longer than the original does not necessarily translate to an hour of excess film.

I'm just saying, with 200 million dollars to throw around I'm expecting Weta workshop to dazzle me for all three hours. Whether they will or not, remains to be seen.
 
I'm a fan of Peter Jackson, but I generally have a problem with remakes and movie's that are 3 hours long. Both of these things always make me thing the director is egomaniacal. It takes a lot to make a good movie after ripping off another and making it last longer than it probably should.
 
I've always been a huge king kong fan. I'm looking forward to this. I just wish they'd change the ending :(
 
Just got back from the screening, and let me dust off a few words I don't think I've ever used in a movie review here:

Amazing
Awesome
Epic

I'm absolutely blown away. This is the best movie I've seen in a very long time. Its considerably better than Jackson's LOTR stuff. Thats right, I said "stuff" in reference to LOTR. Kong inspires an extrodinary ammount of empahy for a CG animal. I could feel the lump in my throat welling up at several points, and had to fight to stay tear-free.

The action is the best I've ever seen. The only thing that comes to mind is my first play through of Resident Evil 4. I think its saying something to equivocate the action in a passive medium, (film), with that of an active one (video games). This is also the only movie I've seen since childhood that made me want to cover my eyes at times; Its that graphic. I don't know how this movie dodged an R rating. Maybe it was the refreshing absence of profanity, and even the near absence of exclamations like "god!", "jesus!", or "Christ!". That isn't a selling point with me, at all, but it kind of made the 1930s seem more believable (though, I'm pretty sure people swore back then).

As for the Length, its not really a big deal for me in the first place. I certainly shifted in my seat plenty, but once Kong was introduced, I completely lost track of time. I don't see a problem at all with adding length to a remake of a classic. I can say with confidence that if the original producers and crew could have made the original King Kong with as much money and trust in their director as Jackson had, they would have produced something on this scale.

Perfect casting, all around: no exceptions.

5 out of a possible 4 stars. Go see as soon as possible (in a fucking theater, for gods sake. This isn't something that was made to be viewed via cam rip, compressed on your 17inch lcd monitor).
 
rate this film %)

can't wait to see this in a couple of weeks.
 
atlas said:
I'm absolutely blown away. This is the best movie I've seen in a very long time. Its considerably better than Jackson's LOTR stuff.

Yeah, but is it better than Meet the Feebles?
 
Universal is owned by General Electric????????
related :

"chart linking four major record labels to their respective holdings in the military industrial complex" on the back panel of godspeed you! black emperor's last album, yanqui u.x.o. "Yanqui" is the Spanish word for "Yankee." U.X.O. stands for unexploded ordnance (e.g, cluster bombs)

mapofevilinvert.jpg
 
Top