FDA Study Links Ritalin To Sudden Death

Tchort

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
2,390
6/17/2009

The Examiner


In a new study conducted by the Food and Drug Administration, more evidence is pouring in to suggest that many healthy young people could be harmed if given controversial psychotropic drugs used to treat Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). The disorders are commonly diagnosed in the elementary and middle school years and describe children who are unable to fixate their attention on any one subject for a prolonged period of time. The hyperactivity is signified by extreme bouts of high energy activity in the child. It is often diagnosed by pediatricians who ask parents and teachers to fill out questionnaires and the child is treated more often than not by stimulants, such as Ritalin (methylphenidate).

The study was only conducted with Ritalin, and it not intended to make any statements of any other medications. This is far from the first study done of this issue, but many studies are necessary to make a definitive decision regarding the medication’s risk. The study states that sudden cardiac arrests in healthy children and young adults are at an increase when the young person was taking Ritalin, at least by a small margin. The study was conducted with a control group and any children with a personal or family history of heart abnormalities were eliminated from the study. The young person had to have perished while he was taking the medication and does not include any children that may have passed away after ending drug treatment. The person must have been between the ages of seven to nineteen, and adults were not included.

As a psychology student I am aware of the risks associated with drug treatment and believe strongly in the reality of over-diagnosis that occurs in the field of psychology, especially in the case of ADD and related childhood conditions. I think it is important for all people to remember that psychology is a soft science, not a hard one. There is no definitive mark on a slide. People need to be diagnosed on a case by case basis and a patient may not fit an exact diagnosis in order to be afflicted with a disorder. I defend the right of psychology and psychiatry to exist, and believe they are of the same importance as medical doctors. A person conflicted with the decision of whether or not to live when they have depression is at the same risk as someone who has cancer or another life-threatening disease. However, I think it does everyone a great disservice in allowing the public school system (who often receive millions in funding from drug companies each year) to push medication on children, parents, and doctors. It is also not in the best interest of children to allow anyone but a psychologist or psychiatrist to diagnose over a period of time, rather than a pediatrician, who may not be well versed in the risks and alternatives of medications, who often make the decision based upon a five minute or less meeting with most of the questions aimed at the parent.

I think drug therapy can be beneficial and necessary for many people. Adults who are informed of the risks should be able to obtain prescriptions of the medications. It is in my opinion that children should not be given any psychotropic drugs with the exception of anti-psychotics for confirmed cases of schizophrenia and other more extreme disorders, or in the case of suicidal children, and only then with very vigilant supervision. Psychotropics, even those specifically marketed primarily to children, such as medications for ADD, have very seldom been tested on people under the age of 18. Because young bodies are far from smaller versions of their adult counterparts it is best not to give a medication intended for adults to children, even in smaller portions, unless close supervision by medical professionals.

There are alternatives to drug therapy for ADD/ADHD. Many parents have found great promise in an overhaul of their child’s diet and exercise plans. Though it is scientifically unfounded that sugar causes children to be hyperactive, non-nutritive rich foods and foods laden with chemicals, preservatives, and artificial flavorings or colorings have been known to cause some children to become hyperactive and when these foods are deleted from a child’s diet, hyperactivity levels improves dramatically. Exercise helps a lot in many mental health areas, especially in ADD and ADHD. Many children need extra attention or intervention from parents, extra help with homework, and because ADHD is a psychological disorder, it is important not to forget that children with problems in school and at home may benefit from cognitive/behavioral therapy (talk therapy) with a psychologist.

We need to remember that there have been but a few tests done on this exact problem with psychotropic medications, they were correlational studies, and zeroed in on one medication. We cannot vilify an entire medical discipline or behave like proverbial chickens with their heads cut off on this issue. But it is an important thing to remember in the recent talk about health and our concern with the subject. And as always, these decisions need to be made by parents and doctors, not by schools or bureaucrats.

http://www.examiner.com/x-13415-Ral...A-study-makes-Ritalin-sudden-death-connection
 
^ I agree! It is truly mind boggling that an adult can not choose to use amphetamines for either recreation or increased productivity, but a child will be force fed psycho-stimulants if a doctor feels it will make life easier for their parents and teachers.
 
^ I agree! It is truly mind boggling that an adult can not choose to use amphetamines for either recreation or increased productivity, but a child will be force fed psycho-stimulants if a doctor feels it will make life easier for their parents and teachers.

It's worse than that in some areas, I don't know what the status of this practice is currently, but within the last few years it came out that certain jurisdictions allowed school nurses to give psychoactive medicinal drugs to schoolchildren if they were unruly, disobedient, etc. I remember reading a few news articles on the subject, but I can't recall whether this was an actual practice going on, or if it was one of those 'in the works' legislative efforts that was eventually shouted down, or what.
 
I never heard of that Tchort but that is screwed up. I doubt that would ever have happened where I live as schools need to phone parents to give kids panadol.

I just think it is screwed the way they will cram drugs like these down kids throats to make life easier for the adults and disregard the consequences for the kids, the amount of diagnoses of ADD/ADHD is nothing short of ridiculous and I am of the opinion that it doesn't technically exist.

I recognise some children have learning and concentration problems but I think they have taken the majority of these symptoms and put a label on it as an excuse to use drugs as a quick fix rather than spend the time and money trying to work through the childs problems.
 
Good hopefully now people will not give these things to kids so readily. When i worked as a tech at a pharmacy i refused to fill at least 5 scripts because the person in question was under 10 years old. Basically i told the pharmacist that if she didnt want to fill plan b because she thought it was killing a child i could refuse to give stimulants for the same reason.

The practice of giving stimulants to kids because they act like children and not adults is one of the few things that really angers me. Now maybe kids can be kids again.
 
Good hopefully now people will not give these things to kids so readily. When i worked as a tech at a pharmacy i refused to fill at least 5 scripts because the person in question was under 10 years old. Basically i told the pharmacist that if she didnt want to fill plan b because she thought it was killing a child i could refuse to give stimulants for the same reason.

The practice of giving stimulants to kids because they act like children and not adults is one of the few things that really angers me. Now maybe kids can be kids again.

I too am/was a pharmacy technician, and I remember all of the controversy after Plan B became OTC over the 'moral clause' ethical dilemma. I am glad someone is using it beyond the intention of the lobbyists of the Christian Right (i.e. simply for them to use to refuse to dispense emergency contraception).
 
The kids at increased risk are probably McFlurry swilling porkers who cant afford any extra strain on their ticker...
 
Agreed.

Every effort should be made to help the child in non medicated ways before cramming pills down their throat.

There is definitely a deference between an adult choosing to take medication and a child being subject to medication.

We can never blame the health professionals for trying to help, but rather point the finger at the parents. If you are willing to have a child, you must be willing to look after it.

Obviously there are legitimate cases for medication being given to children, but not many.
 
Unfortunately poor parenting is often overlooked as a cause of developmental and behavioral problems in children. The first reaction by a GP or nurse practitioner or pediatrician is, "the symptoms fit X syndrome, heres a RX." rather than, "How much time do you spend with your child a day? Do you help them with homework, do you read with them, do you set rules and routines and stick to them, what is your means of discipline, etc?"
 
If you actually read the study, it was a bad one. A small amount of the kids actually died, and the difference was so insignificant, you can't tell if the ADHD medicine did ANYTHING.

But don't get me wrong, I was on ADHD meds as a kid. I do think I needed them, and looking back those ADHD pills do not bother me half as much as the antidepressants do.

Who was I? Was any of that happiness legitimate...?
 
But don't get me wrong, I was on ADHD meds as a kid. I do think I needed them, and looking back those ADHD pills do not bother me half as much as the antidepressants do.

Yeah that's true ADD/ADHD do exist. Also the medications do help people who have it.

It's like how if you are bipolar or OCD and take medications for that and they help, along with therapy.

We do not know how the brain or body work.

What we do know is that people who have ADD/ADHD can become more focused and calmed down with the help of stimulants.

Different drugs effect everyone differently. I know a doctor who takes Zoloft for back issues/nerve pain, and Valium in low doses does something else besides knock you out or calm you down.

Their body and brain seem to react differently to them than people who do not have ADD and they are given in low doses and are supposed to be monitored by doctors.

I realize that there's the huge potential for abuse but people can abuse any medication and self medicate with it.

ADD/ADHD do exist.

I have a friend that has it and he is really bad at even maintaining a simple conversation or going about his day, and I can only imagine how hard it is for him to do things that other people would find simple.

I also agree that a lot of people say that they have ADD/ADHD just to get amphetamines/stimulants when they do not really have either. It's also fucked up how the one person wrote that schools can somehow just give out meds to students who are "bad" or just don't give a fuck and screw around in class or don't give a fuck about school, or find it boring like most kids do at one point or another.
 
Last edited:
Top