antEater
Bluelighter
Okay, here's my story. I'm located in Irvine, Orange County, CA, USA.
On 6/3/02, I received a traffic ticket for crossing a double yellow line. It said to appear before the judge before 7/3 if I wanted to protest. Well, I was going to but I got lazy. So I figured that they would send me a packet saying what to do if you're not going to show up there.
Along comes 7/24, and I receive a postcard saying that because I didn't appear and I didn't pay my "bail" on time, the new bail is 450$ and I have some sort of misdemeanor or something.
My question is, if I go in front of the judge and say that I never received the packet telling me what to do if I didn't appear, and I tell him I can pay whatever the old "bail" was, which I'm assuming is like 100$-150$ at that moment, would it be reasonable to assume that he would let me off the hook with the lower fine?
On 6/3/02, I received a traffic ticket for crossing a double yellow line. It said to appear before the judge before 7/3 if I wanted to protest. Well, I was going to but I got lazy. So I figured that they would send me a packet saying what to do if you're not going to show up there.
Along comes 7/24, and I receive a postcard saying that because I didn't appear and I didn't pay my "bail" on time, the new bail is 450$ and I have some sort of misdemeanor or something.
My question is, if I go in front of the judge and say that I never received the packet telling me what to do if I didn't appear, and I tell him I can pay whatever the old "bail" was, which I'm assuming is like 100$-150$ at that moment, would it be reasonable to assume that he would let me off the hook with the lower fine?