F.D.A. Bans Sale of Flavored Cigarettes

Huaca

Greenlighter
Joined
Jan 7, 2009
Messages
895
Location
Outside the matrix
F.D.A. Bans Sale of Flavored Cigarettes
By GARDINER HARRIS
NYTimes.com
Published: September 22, 2009

WASHINGTON – Federal health officials Tuesday banned the sale of flavored cigarettes and hinted that they may soon take action against the far-larger market of flavored little cigars and cigarillos, the first major crackdown on cigarettes since the Food and Drug Administration was given authority to regulate tobacco.

The ban is intended to end the sale of tobacco products with chocolate, vanilla, clove and other flavorings that lure children and teenagers into smoking. Menthol products are as yet unaffected.

The ban comes three months after President Obama signed legislation giving the F.D.A. the authority for the first time to regulate tobacco products.

“These flavored cigarettes are a gateway for many children and young adults to become regular smokers,” said Dr. Margaret Hamburg, commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, in announcing the ban.

In 2004, 17-year-old smokers were more than three times as likely as those over the age of 25 to smoke flavored cigarettes, and they viewed flavored cigarettes as safer. Among the more famous flavored cigarette introductions was that of Camel Exotic Blends by R.J. Reynolds, which had such flavors as Twista Lime, Kauai Kolada and Warm Winter Toffee.

“Banning the marketing and use of strawberry, chocolate and other flavored cigarettes will help slow the rate of addiction among young smokers, preventing disease and saving millions in health care costs down the line,” said Senator Tom Harkin, an Iowa Democrat.

Every day, 3,600 children and teens start smoking and 1,100 become daily smokers, studies show.

The legislation giving the F.D.A. regulatory power over cigarettes required the agency to ban flavored cigarettes but did not clearly define what constituted a cigarette.

In a press conference Tuesday, agency officials were deliberately vague when asked whether the ban would apply to flavored little cigars like Swisher Sweets or cigarillos like Black & Mild, which can have flavors like apple and chocolate.

F.D.A. agents visited a tobacco store in Mobile, Ala., on Saturday and told the owner that the flavoring ban included cigarillos like Black & Mild, according to Norman Sharp, president of the Cigar Association of America.

Another cigar store owner told Mr. Sharp that an F.D.A. representative called last week to tell her to remove every flavored tobacco product from her shelves that “looked like a cigarette” but could not define what that meant, Mr. Sharp said.

In a letter to manufacturers, the agency said the ban applied to all cigarette-like tobacco products even if they “are labeled as cigars or as some other product.” And in another document to manufacturers, the agency wrote that it is “examining options for regulating both menthol cigarettes and flavored tobacco products other than cigarettes.”

Matthew Myers, president of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, hailed Tuesday’s announcement and said that it clearly applied to flavored little cigars that are virtually identical to cigarettes.

“The F.D.A. demonstrated that they’re serious about enforcing the ban on flavored cigarettes and serious about preventing tobacco companies from circumventing that ban with other tobacco products that appeal to children,” Mr. Myers said.

Mr. Sharp of the cigar association also praised the announcement and said the agency clearly did not intend the ban to apply to little cigars and cigarillos.

“We feel this should go a long way to clearing up any confusion in the marketplace”, Mr. Sharp said.

David Howard, a spokesman for R.J. Reynolds, said the confusion benefits no one.

“It’s hard to understand,” Mr. Howard said. “We need clear and timely guidance so all of us can work together so that we can understand what we need to be doing.”

An R.J. Reynolds subsidiary sells small cigars, which look like brown cigarettes, but Mr. Howard said that no one would confuse small cigars with cigarettes.

“They are not cigarettes,” he said.

The confusion surrounding the ban results in part from the tight timelines that Congress inserted into the tobacco legislation. Dr. Lawrence Deyton, director of the F.D.A.’s tobacco center, has been the on the job only a week and has barely begun hiring staff. But the ban on flavored cigarettes had to go into effect 90 days after the legislation was signed, and so it did.

The distinction between cigarettes and cigars has long revolved around the wrapping. Cigarettes are made of tobacco wrapped in paper, and cigars are made of tobacco wrapped in tobacco or paper constituted from tobacco. The tobacco inside the products also generally differs.

While cigarette sales are declining about 4 percent annually, those of cigars and cigarillos have been steadily rising in part because taxes and regulations of cigars are less onerous than those on cigarettes.

Dr. Deyton was asked several times if Tuesday’s ban applied to any little cigars or cigarillos. “According to the law, if something is wrapped in a tobacco leaf, that would not be considered,” he said and then stopped and added: “Hold on just a second.”

After a delay, Catherine Lorraine, a lawyer in the agency’s tobacco center, got on the call and said that if consumers believe a product is a cigarette, then the law defines it as a cigarette no matter how it is wrapped or labeled.

“We will be looking at products on an individual basis to determine if it meets that aspect of the legislation,” Ms. Lorraine said.

Brian M. Mulholland, general manager of Georgetown Tobacco, said his store got rid of its clove cigarettes two weeks ago. Flavored cigarettes comprised less than 5 percent of the store’s sales, and some of those who smoked flavored cigarettes have switched to cigars, he said.

“It’s been an opportunity to educate the consumer on switching,” Mr. Mulholland said. “They’re making the transition.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/23/health/policy/23fda.html?_r=2&hp
 
Another cigar store owner told Mr. Sharp that an F.D.A. representative called last week to tell her to remove every flavored tobacco product from her shelves that “looked like a cigarette” but could not define what that meant, Mr. Sharp said.

Another clusterfuck. With the government, the left hand never knows what the right is doing.

Just don't sell any tobacco products to minors. It's unnecessary and heavy-handed to deprive adults of tobacco choices. If the government is so concerned about children, then why are they bombing villages in Afghanistan and Iraq?
 
^Clusterfuck is the perfect adjective lol. It adds so much red tape to a process that they cant even control it. We need rational discourse in washington, other wise loonwy shit like this pops up.
 
How ridiculous! If the products are restricted to adults I don't see what the problem is?

So because a kid MIGHT prefer a flavoured cigarette to a normal one (I had no problems smoking normal cigarettes as a young teenager) an adult shouldn't have the option of enjoying them?

These laws are because of cry baby anti smoking groups whos agenda is to slowly but surely ban smoking. This will do nothing to discourage kids from smoking at all in my opinion.
 
another step on the road towards illegalizing tobacco, not just on the "books" but on "nation's conscience". and i gotta say, i called it years ago :P after reading a speech by a sociologist Dr Whitebread, who called it 15 years ago. he examined the trends leading up to all the prohibitions of all the drugs, and said the beginning of tobacco prohibition was starting

and the idea that kids enter cigarettes via flavored ones is ridiculous, as the poster above said it's a scapegoat. i have a lil bro and i am somewhat "in touch" with middleschool and highschool bonobo monkeys (i mean kids). they like normal cigs...
 
interesting, i didn't think the feds had the balls to pull this one off. i foresee a lot of backlash.....


also,

RIP Dr. Charles H. Whitebread II (1943-2008, Deceased: Lung Cancer)


I think the Attorney General should approve another label that contains information that the scientific community has known about cigarettes since 1964:

WARNING: CIGARETTES ARE RADIOACTIVE AND WILL DEPOSIT CANCER-CAUSING POLONIUM-210 (and Lead-210) INTO YOUR BODY

for further study:
http://www.epa.gov/rpdweb00/sources/tobacco.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/01/opinion/01proctor.html
http://www.tobacco.org/Documents/dd/ddradioactivecigs.html

etc, etc.

nicotine plays only a small role in the carcinogenic activity of tobacco. most tobacco-related cancer comes from polonium-210.
 
Last edited:
I loved those fucking candy cigarettes. I don't smoke now because of them, I smoke because when I was in high school I wanted to impress my g/f and other people at the time, I ended up getting hooked. I smoked for 4 whole years, not everyday, but maybe 2 packs a week. Before making the switch to everyday. i have cut back a lot but can't seem to quit. Now I want a candy cig.
 
I honestly wish all tobacco products were made illegal, and I'm a smoker. I'm down to about 4 cigs a day, but I feel like the only way I can actually quit is if they aren't available anymore. I can honestly say I hate cigarettes (a bit hypocritical, I know).
 
Of course, nobody's going to touch flavored liquors.
Anyone heard of 4loco? Its in a freaking can!

This just seems really unorganized... It's really not a bad idea it's just getting rushed out and half assed, but than again on the swisher box it does say "This is not a safer alternative to cigarettes" Mabey it should be law to warn them that its still [processed] tobaccoo in [wrapped in] tobaccoo.
 
In a press conference Tuesday, agency officials were deliberately vague when asked whether the ban would apply to flavored little cigars like Swisher Sweets
NO! NOOOOOOOOOOOOO
my favorite bluntwraps
 
nicotine plays only a small role in the carcinogenic activity of tobacco. most tobacco-related cancer comes from polonium-210.

Don't forget that organic tobacco doesn't quite have this problem. Nor does non-organic tobacco HAVE to. The tobacco companies chose decades ago and have stuck with their decision to use cheaper fertilizers that come from radioactive ore instead of more expensive non-radioactive fertilizers.
 
Menthol products are as yet unaffected.

HA! no shit. You wanna see a REAL Million Man March, try to make newports illegal, washington would be a shoulder to shoulder sea of dark n pissed

=p
 
Don't forget that organic tobacco doesn't quite have this problem. Nor does non-organic tobacco HAVE to. The tobacco companies chose decades ago and have stuck with their decision to use cheaper fertilizers that come from radioactive ore instead of more expensive non-radioactive fertilizers.

yeah, phosphate-based fertilizers are notorious for being contaminated with radioactive isotopes. regardless of which fertilizers or soil you use, tobacco will always collect whatever radioactive isotopes are present, even if grown organically (which reduces but does not eliminate their presence).
 
I don't see tobacco being illegal anytime soon. Here's why:
The ban comes three months after President Obama signed legislation giving the F.D.A. the authority to regulate tobacco products, which had $96 billion in sales in 2008, with $87 billion in cigarette sales; $4 billion in cigar, small cigar and cigarillo sales; and $4.6 billion in chewing tobacco, snuff and loose tobacco sales.

That's from the article, it seems some text got lost while the OP copied and pasted. :|
 
I honestly wish all tobacco products were made illegal, and I'm a smoker. I'm down to about 4 cigs a day, but I feel like the only way I can actually quit is if they aren't available anymore. I can honestly say I hate cigarettes (a bit hypocritical, I know).

How fucking stupid can you get? You're a drug user or why would you be on this forum and you want a drug made illegal, you're IN FAVOR of drug prohibition.

It won't even stop you from using it, you'll just be copping it fom a dealer like other drugs. Get some damn will power and stop trying to impose unjust laws on other people to make up for your own shortcomings. And yea! another thing the poor and oppressed can be shaken down for by cops while the middle class and rich have guys delivering packs of cigs to their door for a nice mark up of course.

Give me a break all you drug users cheering on tobacco prohibition, how dumb can you get.
 
Top