So... I've noticed you keep referring to this as national socialism. I've noticed several of your posts using the term. Now, you can say whatever you like as far as I'm concerned. But I am curious. Why do you use that phrase, and what exactly is it you're referring to by using it? Like, from context I've been assuming you're pretty much using it as a substitute for calling something fascist. But... why not then just call it fascist?
I just find it confusing cause I'm really not sure what you mean or think you mean by using the term national socialism.
closing off the borders, denigrating one racial/ethnic group for all the problems, getting the wealthy wealthier.
the main difference is that he's stripping away good regulations, leaving bad ones; but he's also doing horrible over-control of the economy through the tariff war and this type of strangle-holding free enterprises, as well as holding the media to be an enemy of the people and only supporting state-sponsored media, very much so is reminiscent of national socialism.
"There were good and bad people on both sides" = directly means he believes
that there were good people on the side of far right fascist neo-nazis. If that's not an open endorsement for national socialism, I don't know what is.
Promising the workers their jobs, a good life, blaming the Mexicans (or Jews) is very much so nat'l socialism rhetoric, almost as if he's channeling Adolf Hitler from beyond the grave.
Trump is also a fan of egregiously violating people's constitutional rights at almost every place he could have.
When we have had disagreements with previous presidents, normally they're about rather benign issues or positions. Trump's radical far-right policies are dangerous.