Jakeperson, when you remove all the crap an left with a decent ammount of pure dex, wow hits hard.
if you want to use for lines. go ask your doc about getting your dex in a cap. there are a two maybe chemists in perth that make these up. they import the pure dexamphet and then mix up with a celulos (fibre, i asked on first pickup) in a capsual. i did have these made up for me for a while, bout 4 years ago, process may have changed. one cap was 60mg dexamphet power and how ever much celulos to go with. im not exactly how this works, but both ingrediants had a pure white powder appearance, i can only presume they utilize the stomach acid to bind everything together thus not absorbing in the stomach and waiting untill intestine to scrap break down and absorb. that said if anyone can add anything more about that i would be keen to know the truth. back on topic, these were probally the best lines anyone could hope for. how ever all the celulos you snort ends up horrible boogers, should you do allot. one cap between 4 ppl. wasnt a very big line. but was like you just lined 4 dexies at once. shouted loads of mates an everyone was very impressed. Much easier than having to crush those little tiny balls you get in Ridalin caps and dextroamphetamine extended release 30 mg (work trip to usa,
http://www.drugs.com/imprints/m-amphet-salts-30-mg-15896.html) for the record yes its very easy to get your script filled/re-isshued in america, but your going to need a crash cart to get your heart going when you get to the chemist. crack is cheaper.
When i was getting these caps i never comtemplated filtering them, but perhaps it might be easier than the chalk and glue
Few years back I played about with this a few times, purely for shits an giggles. The problem i found in the past was when it would dry out it would end up fairly goey. But i wasnt very "accurate" about my method's. i may have been a little excellerated from other substances. (12 month bender. wooops) feel free to half a laugh at my half wit attempt. when i recall im left with a funny expression on my face, wtf was i thinking. oh wait. thats the problem, i wasnt. nice
an before pancho06 gets upset. yes i probally wasted about 400 d5 tablets. BUT THATS SCIENCE
lol.
now remember i was just playing about.
First crust the dex. used a granite mortar an pestle, place 50-100 dexamphet inside, i'd cover the top with glad wrap, poke a hole in the centre so on so on, untill smooth powder consistancy. place into a glass then add mount franklin water, not sure of how much, i'd keep going untill it went from being a saturated solution.
for filtering one time i used a big syringe, about 40mm diameter, take the plunger all the way out. then cram cotton buds in the bottom and then coffee filter, i'd manipulate the buds and filter so i ended with a V shape coffee filter inside a U syringe. about 50-100mm of cotton buds to push the liquid thought. then pore the solution into the V well, insert plungers and filter. the reason for the V well was so the liquid wasnt simply pushed down the side passing the filter.
to dry i used a kitchen saucer with a strainer over the top to keep the dust off. well i tryed a few things, this is one i remember. took a few days to dry. i would always end up with the same goey mess, except an outta ring which would be a hard pure amphet, not crystal. crushed that an have as a line an you know about it. power ranger GO.
Now im unsure of how many micros i was filtering too. i never weighted up any of the solutions before or after filters, but that would give some indication of what was removed, and i never weighted the lines i got from. so i cant tell you the effectivness of what i did. besides it being effective in keeping me ammused while watching hot dogs late night game show.
from my understanding you cant use the solvent an accetone filter technique.
some of the things i wonder about is;
the binding agent, that be water soluable, if so how would that be remove/seperated, as i presumed that goey stuff i ended up with was mostly that.
If there some way of working out how fine a filter would be best to go down to. is chalk, when absorbed in solution, larger or finer than the dexamphet.
could this possibly require doing a few filter runs. if the size of the amphet in solution was removed at .25 micron. but the binding agent was finer and chalk coarser.
Would it be possible to use some solvent to cause the amphet to group thus allowing easy removal from the solution, then just drying out.
I'd be very thankful Junkie skumbag if you could work out a way of freebasing. i mainly just want to be able to compare the difference in effect between eat and smoke.
not sure if i've added anything useful here. probally just what not to do
but thats science hey. oh wait. i know what i did wrong. no white lab coat.
