• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion

    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Shambles

Evidence of dealing

C

class-a-team

Ex-Bluelighter
Joined
Jul 9, 2011
Messages
877
Would somebody need to be caught in possession in order to be caught dealing or would text messages be adequate?
 
Thank you sooo much for your quick response, I was practically sick with worry. A very messy situation going on in life at the moment I'm afraid but this has put my nerves at ease somewhat.
 
If you do get arrested no comment all the way.....put any scales baggies and large amounts of money somewhere they can't be found and you should be OK
 
textx and emails can be used in court - there is a mate on here who might want to say what happened to them but thats up to them , lets just say that dont say anything in a tx or em\ail that u woudnt shout at the top of your voice in the town sq
 
100% with blondin on this one, Texts can be and are used as evidence in a court of law
 
conspiracy to supply, but you'd be pretty unlucky, unless you've arranged import/export over the phone or through texts
 
If it's just a couple of messages with no hard evidence such as scales etc then you'd be unlucky for anything to happen. I'm not sure with exactly what they could charge you with but I can't imagine they'd be able to do you much without anything else to go on than some messages, unless they were outgoing texts. Surely if it's the case they are just inbound messages it'd be the same as it is if you were to have a package intercepted in the mail no?
Must echo what blondin says, if you're going to intend to sell droogz then using text messages is rather unwise..
 
They can do anything they want. If they're short of prosecutions they might just charge you anyway. If you deny it then they can always take it to court and see whether the jury believes you wern't dealing when the messages are read out in court.

It's a very difficult situation, you can either stonewall or plead guilty at the first chance in the hope that the judge will go easier on you - he might, or he might be a judge who believes all drug dealers should be rounded up and consigned to concentration camps.
 
Last edited:
Do people reckon they would try to charge someone with conspiracy to supply if they actually weren't doing any sort of dealing, but had scales, baggies and empty gelcaps?
 
Depends on a lot of different things - how the prosecution quota is looking that month, how they're feeling, if you've no previous, if you've got a short back and sides etc.
 
Ismene said:
They can do anything they want.
Click to expand...

police-state.jpg
 
StoneHappyMonday said:
Supply. Conspiracy to supply. Offering to supply.
Click to expand...

It was a genuine question. The only one I've really heard is possession with intent. You reckon you can get done for the others even with no drugs on the table then? Could you not just claim that you're a mad fantasist who likes to lie about being Tony Montana?

StoneHappyMonday said:
Should be charged with gross stupidity.
Click to expand...

Haha, yes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top