.vecktor said:Don't expect our masters to listen to logic or science, they have long said thaey would follow an evidence based approach to drug legislation, well the ovewhelming evidence is that prohibition doesn't work, do they change their approach??? of course not. the war on drugs could end, but as it is a war of attrition, like Vietnam or an Iraq, it needs a catalyst like the Tet offensive was in Vietnam to turn the public.
Fanch said:Also, that's a good point clamjuice!
The most fascinating facet about the recent Democratic takeover in Congress is the hope for medical marijuana legislation. Maybe we stand a chance with a slight majority. In all probability, it will take another decade IMO before we see significant change. But keep hope alive!!
AMEN to thatKicksave said:Ha! You think having the Dems in power makes legal marijuana even slightly more possible? You're dreaming. Want to legalize drugs and stop pouring $50B a year into the "war on drugs"? Vote Libertarian.
qftfastandbulbous said:Well the A, B & C classification is sopposed to refelect their potential for causing harm, so having LSD etc as class A and barbiturates as class B is so utterly wrong that it makes a mockery of the whole classification system. They really need to reconsider the classification of all drugs if they're going to use a system like that
If alcohol, tobacco & caffeine were classed in that way then alcohol & tobacco would be class A and caffeine class C...
It makes me so angry/disappointed that these wonderful substances cannot even be studied properly just because some moron/s believe its as harmful as crack cocaine or heroin
sn0wburt0n said:AMEN to that