Have you ever thought about just editing your last post instead of posting 30x single sentence posts in a row?? Because technically youre spamming the forum and we've all talked about this and no one is happy about it.
Also you clearly have very little idea about SAR or neurochemistry. You can't just stick a methylenedioxy group onto a molecule and expect it to be psychoactitve. Pretty sure a lot of these can't exist, at least based on your naming. Are you drawing these and generating a name via a tool? Very few of these compounds are even indoles...
kid just speculates, does not know chemistry at all, and most SAR chemists would never waste their time making 85% of these.
Hate to be mean, i just get irritated by incessant nonsense/garbage posts. It's a good thing I'm not a Mod in this forum.
@Skorpio back me up here?
http://www.swisstargetprediction.ch/
PLEASE go take a look at this site. You can either draw the molecules yourself or find the smiles code and input it. The website, while far from perfect, predicts binding of a random chemical to different receptor systems. You can also predict polarities, solubilities, maoi activity etc by clicking the little pill icon. It's an extremely useful tool. Please learn how to use it.
I would also recommend checking out:
http://www.chem.uiuc.edu/GenChemReferences/nomenclature_rules.html