azzazza !?
Bluelighter
I can't empty my mind of thought because the echo is, itself, thought.
spot on. the internal monologue, thought is exactly the echo. but the echo of what? (its also closely connected to Derridas concept of 'la trace' (a trail or track) there is only the trail, but one never really gets a hold of that of which there is a trace. so the thought, by means of its existence and its finality, 'finalizes' or better 'de-fines' (comes from latin 'fines' which means border,boundary,limit) the experience. the piont is that a division occurs but at the same time its an identity, because this division (différance) by means of language constitutes the experience in its being an echo of it. the experience is always immediatly named, and only then does it become the experience; differentiated from the infinite unity that is 'now'. it is exactly the thought-echo that always 'taints' the full or fulfilling presence by de-fining ('carving') it out of this infinity. problem is that the infinity that is present is never actually experienced because of this. it is only by means of the thought-echo (the trail) that one returns to the 'original', only to transform it at that very moment into what the echo was, yet giving life/birth to it. so structurally speaking; your first/original 'thought' is actually constituted by the second one, strange as that may sound. the formation of thought/word out of the 'now' happens in this iterinary structure. in normal, baseline consciousness, this happens so fast and unconscious that it is never noticed. we naturally divide the world up in 'bed','tree','bird'; we don't even notice the words anymore we once as a child learned "that is this, this is that". strangest structure it is; "that is this", yes sir!
[wanders off into the distance humming a song]
Last edited: