w01fg4ng
Bluelighter
No one said it would be easy or quick.
No, it's much more likely that the current interpretation of it is wrong and needs to be corrected.
Just another reason it needs to be regulated. The cost of regulation doesn't have to be expensive either. Software could handle most of the hard work.
Why do we need cops if they don't solve all our crimes?Except it's not actually doable. How are we supposed to stop people getting access to information on the internet? With modern cryptography, anyone can send any arbitrary information to anyone else. We don't have to power to stop it. What's the point?
This is assumed as part of regulation.It would make MUCH more sense to change how we regulate ammunition.
Well, I did see Trump's tweet for the first time today so that is a reaction to something. However I first heard about 3d printed guns years ago and felt the same then as I do now. How long do I need to wait until it's not a reaction?It's just bad policy made for bad reasons. It's all reactionary.
Why do we need cops if they don't solve all our crimes?
This is assumed as part of regulation.
Well, I did see Trump's tweet for the first time today so that is a reaction to something. However I first heard about 3d printed guns years ago and felt the same then as I do now. How long do I need to wait until it's not a reaction?
All it will take is for the price to drop for it to go from, "why", to "why not".
Just a heads up, really.
Firework regulations department will probably pick up the slack here.
By Associated Press July 31 at 6:21 PM
SEATTLE — The Latest on President Donald Trump and downloadable blueprints for a 3D-printed gun (all times local):
3:15 p.m.
A federal judge in Seattle has issued a temporary restraining order to stop the release of blueprints to make untraceable and undetectable 3D-printed plastic guns.
Eight Democratic attorneys general filed a lawsuit Monday seeking to block the federal government’s settlement with the company that makes the plans available online. They also sought a restraining order, arguing the 3D guns would be a safety risk.
U.S. District Judge Robert Lasnik issued the order Tuesday afternoon.
The company behind the plans, Austin, Texas-based Defense Distributed, had reached a settlement with the federal government in June that allows it to make the plans for the guns available for download on Wednesday.
The restraining order puts that plan on hold for now.
In the meantime, Congressional Democrats have urged President Trump to reverse the decision to let Defense Distributed publish the plans. Trump said Tuesday that he’s “looking into” the idea, saying making 3D plastic guns available to the public “doesn’t seem to make much sense!
5:30 p.m.
The White House is declining to say whether the president thinks blueprints for printing plastic guns should be available to the public.
Spokesman Hogan Gidley tells reporters aboard Air Force One that President Donald Trump “is committed to the safety and security of all Americans and considers this his highest responsibility.”
Gidley notes that it’s currently illegal to own or make a wholly plastic gun, including any made with a 3D printer, and says the administration supports that law and “will continue to look at all options available to us to do what is necessary to protect Americans while also supporting the First and Second amendments.”
Well, lets qualify that by blow up in your face, I mean it could give you fairly serious injuries to your hands and more minor injuries to your face. And with that in mind. Yeah, I can't say I see that as a serious threat. Not when there are so many more dangerous things in every day life that we pay no attention to. And when you keep in mind that we can't actually do anything about it anyway. No, I wouldn't call it a serious threat.
I mean, if you have access to ammunition, and if you're worried about people using 3d guns, then you must be assuming they do. Then they can already easily build a pipe bomb with ordinary materials from any hardware store, with no 3d printer at all, and kill substantially more people. Why aren't we worrying about that?
First story from this year after a quick Google:Lmao
During July 4th there is a ton of illegal fireworks.
Cops don?t respond to calls.
The reason child pornography is illegal is because its existence necessitates the harm of a child. Blueprints for a plastic gun isn?t inherently or necessarily harming anyone. It?s not an apt comparison.
By that logic, videos that depict violence would fall under the same category and Liveleak has no shortage of those.
It's quite legal. Rape, sexual abuse of children, furries and necrophilia come to mind.I think it's illegal in order to punish people for sexual deviancy.
Besides, virtual porn (CGI, drawings of porn) are also illegal in the US, and there is nothing inherently harmful in a drawing.
Federal Judge blocks release of 3D printed guns
https://www.washingtonpost.com/busi...ee3c38-9510-11e8-818b-e9b7348cd87d_story.html
Files they've attempted to block for reference: https://mega.nz/#!qNcDUJrT!wVzbt6pWi4oJW2Vox4N8kDQcce8kBpBbc_5IMpo1ps4
Includes grenade, rifle, pistol, ammo, muzzle devices and misc. blueprints.
I'm seeing some 3d printer retailing for a few hundred- I don't know what to think.![]()
First story from this year after a quick Google:
50,000 pounds of illegal fireworks seized, 7 arrested in Cal Fire bust
https://amp-sacbee-com.cdn.ampproje...referrer=https://www.google.com&_tf=From %1$s
The funny thing (dark humor funny haha) is your fire Marshall really is the only one picking up ANY slack from lack of gun control.