Funny how easy it is to get people to believe stuff they read in polls/statistics eh?
Anyway,
i personally think its down to how much you yourself can take and how used you are to the drug, theres no point in arguing over whos wrong and whos right without listening to someone elses views cos thats just pathetic IMO, the fact is studies dont prove a damn f'in thing if you ask me. People are to paranoid about this sort of thing, especially americans(not all of you but most) and the reason? cos of all the 'drug is bad' rubbish on american tv, ive witnessed it myself cos we got fox news here in the UK(and that has to be the most paranoid most boring dullest right-wing shit channel ever)not to say we dont get that sort of stuff over here to, its just more active overthere, if you get what i mean.
Bottom line is, some people are saying 1) it makes them drive more easily and freely, or 2) there reaction time is nonexistant, i thinkl the reason why some people say there reaction is slower/nonexistant is cos they either havent smoked in a long time(which one person admitted to in this thread) or they just dont know their limitations that well.
I think under the influence of drinking n driving has more of a chance of killing someone rather than being stoned, but thats from my own personal opinion...