Qnick
Bluelighter
The only way these crazy theories about DMT being involved with dreaming/death/the pineal gland make sense is if your entire knowledge of DMT is through Rick Straussman and T. McKenna.
It makes about as much sense as insisting Santa Clause is real because you get presents every year.
The tenuous similarity between a DMT-state and dreaming isn't proof, it's entirely subjective, and an opinion not shared by all. The NDE similarity can be explained as the psychological processing of an intense and overwhelming experience, though I don't have any experience with a NDE.
And I'm tired of all these people with no DMT experience just reciting factless speculation they've read in a book or internet forum.
It's OK to be wrong, but a firm conviction in things that lack any proof and a willingness to argue over it just make you look foolish. If you truely want to argue, you need to do it with the evidence available, and you can't just discount whatever you feel like based on some intuition you had while tripping on DMT.
In the end this will be settled in the future, but for now there is no evidence for DMT being involved in dreaming or sleep or being formed in the pineal gland, and a decent amount of evidence that would indicate these presumptions are false.
Sorry for the rant, I just get tired of all the bullshit info out there about endogenous DMT. Its to the point where I don't like bringing up DMT due to the inevitable next 30 minutes spent trying to tell whomever I'm speaking to T. McKenna had no factual basis for his assumptions, just a theory that has yet to be proven true despite a large amount of testing.
It makes about as much sense as insisting Santa Clause is real because you get presents every year.
The tenuous similarity between a DMT-state and dreaming isn't proof, it's entirely subjective, and an opinion not shared by all. The NDE similarity can be explained as the psychological processing of an intense and overwhelming experience, though I don't have any experience with a NDE.
And I'm tired of all these people with no DMT experience just reciting factless speculation they've read in a book or internet forum.
It's OK to be wrong, but a firm conviction in things that lack any proof and a willingness to argue over it just make you look foolish. If you truely want to argue, you need to do it with the evidence available, and you can't just discount whatever you feel like based on some intuition you had while tripping on DMT.
In the end this will be settled in the future, but for now there is no evidence for DMT being involved in dreaming or sleep or being formed in the pineal gland, and a decent amount of evidence that would indicate these presumptions are false.
Sorry for the rant, I just get tired of all the bullshit info out there about endogenous DMT. Its to the point where I don't like bringing up DMT due to the inevitable next 30 minutes spent trying to tell whomever I'm speaking to T. McKenna had no factual basis for his assumptions, just a theory that has yet to be proven true despite a large amount of testing.