i was on this other forum (people not quite as friendly over there) and they were talking about different kinds of lsd. i thought if you have lsd, as long as its real and not some sort of rc, its lsd. i've had it in different forms (gel tabs, liquid, paper) but these people were talking about all different kinds of L as if they were different strains of weed or something. they weren't just referring to the blotter paper either they were talking about the color of the crystals, different names, and things like that. so BL, is there different types of LSD?
-
PD Moderators: Esperighanto | JackARoe |
different kinds of LSD?
- Thread starter rocked513
- Start date
NeighborhoodThreat
Bluelight Crew
LSD is LSD is LSD, unless it isn't LSD, then it's...not LSD.
"Different kinds of LSD" could be referring to analogs of LSD, like ALD-52, etc.
"Different kinds of LSD" could be referring to analogs of LSD, like ALD-52, etc.
bigben202
Bluelighter
If you are referring to names Needlepoint, Fluff, Amber, Lavender and so on, it's the purity of the crystal to which they are naming. Just as you can have different purity's with other crystals and chemicals, the same applies to LSD.
michael_1992
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2010
- Messages
- 92
LSD is LSD , there are different forms of LSD (liquid , blotter,etc), but you cant talk about LSD like you would talk about different strands of weed. LSD is a specific chemical, LSD is LSD.
Of course, there can be different blotter arts, different manufacturers,etc. And of course: each manufacturer will put different doses on the blotter paper. So each "brand" would be a different strength.
Of course, there can be different blotter arts, different manufacturers,etc. And of course: each manufacturer will put different doses on the blotter paper. So each "brand" would be a different strength.
plusfourpirate
Bluelighter
..sometimes it refers to the color, which is sometimes used to indicate purity, but ive found more often that not, as some other older ppl w tell ya, that alot of that is just marketing and the theory doesnt hold water. for example, some of the best* L ive ever had had a slight amber tint to it. and yes, LSD is LSD and even though bright white fluffy crystal is ideal, many times color is not a reliable or consistant way to judge purity, as the most minute of impurities such as less than a few percent, can drasticallly chanfe the color of the crystal. in the end something of 60% purity laid at 100ug a dose is really only 60ug a dose; thats the only real significant diff in my opinion...
and if youre dealing w raw crystal, you can tell how pure it is by what you use to dissolve it in, and how easy it dissolves. if its fluffy white and it dissovles easily in sterile water(not tap,ever,of course!) then you know youve got the bees knees
even if it dissolves w.o much work in ethanol you can asssume its pretty pure. now if youve got za bunch of gunk settling or seperating, then you may have a problem :/ again this is all IME..
but these days you really never know. since so many ppl follow that code; for example, someone telling you they have lavender, in most cases certainly never saw the actual crystal, could be their way of telling you- hey its active and legit.. but its not the purest ive ever had. so i guess in some aspect their little scale can help you to guage the strength of what they are giving you.
and tht doesnt just go for LSD; ive seen this fact to lie true w other chems such as DOC, the 4-subs, DPT, DMT, etc.
the best way to tell purity is to taste the shit! and do so w an open mind; dont let the color or :brand name" fool you into thinking its gonna be a "dirtier" or "different kind of trip" such a big part of it is mental and affected by your subjective presumptions- try not to let that get in the way!
it is true that sometimes there are i guess what would be byproducts that were left behind that may have some pschoactive properties on their own. but a lot of that lies within the mind. placebo is a mofo, mang. trust your judgement, not some bs that has no significant relevance except for the stigma that it carries.
and if youre dealing w raw crystal, you can tell how pure it is by what you use to dissolve it in, and how easy it dissolves. if its fluffy white and it dissovles easily in sterile water(not tap,ever,of course!) then you know youve got the bees knees
even if it dissolves w.o much work in ethanol you can asssume its pretty pure. now if youve got za bunch of gunk settling or seperating, then you may have a problem :/ again this is all IME..but these days you really never know. since so many ppl follow that code; for example, someone telling you they have lavender, in most cases certainly never saw the actual crystal, could be their way of telling you- hey its active and legit.. but its not the purest ive ever had. so i guess in some aspect their little scale can help you to guage the strength of what they are giving you.
and tht doesnt just go for LSD; ive seen this fact to lie true w other chems such as DOC, the 4-subs, DPT, DMT, etc.
the best way to tell purity is to taste the shit! and do so w an open mind; dont let the color or :brand name" fool you into thinking its gonna be a "dirtier" or "different kind of trip" such a big part of it is mental and affected by your subjective presumptions- try not to let that get in the way!
it is true that sometimes there are i guess what would be byproducts that were left behind that may have some pschoactive properties on their own. but a lot of that lies within the mind. placebo is a mofo, mang. trust your judgement, not some bs that has no significant relevance except for the stigma that it carries.
Last edited:
there was a mod on this forum, who spoke to D. Nichols about it - he thinks there is a difference from batch to batch
of course personal biochemistry is particularly dynamic on a day to day basis, so i'm combining set and setting with Nichols on this topic, which has been " discussed to death " endless times no doubt in the history of LSD
of course personal biochemistry is particularly dynamic on a day to day basis, so i'm combining set and setting with Nichols on this topic, which has been " discussed to death " endless times no doubt in the history of LSD
plusfourpirate
Bluelighter
^ considering its such a unique and unstable chem , i wouldn't doubt that for the most part bc of general purity issues due to even the smallest mistake in its epic synth, but again, imho, pure white fluffy LSD-25 is LSD. period.
LSD has a specific molecular structure - you can't have "different types of LSD". The molecule either has the correct atoms in the correct place in which case it is LSD, or it doesn't in which case it isn't LSD.
The idea that if it "degrades" it degrades into something that is also psychedelic and that the human brain can then detect this difference is pretty far-fetched.
The idea that if it "degrades" it degrades into something that is also psychedelic and that the human brain can then detect this difference is pretty far-fetched.
There is a thread about LSD analogues probably surfacing here and there, now and again.
You can find it here:
http://www.bluelight.ru/vb/threads/549161-The-Big-amp-Dandy-Non-LSD-Ergoloids-Blotter-Thread
You can find it here:
http://www.bluelight.ru/vb/threads/549161-The-Big-amp-Dandy-Non-LSD-Ergoloids-Blotter-Thread