Yet, this does not mean that all evil is of man's direct and intentional accord and uninfluenced by factors unaware to him.
I absolutely agree, I just don't see why it should be somehow "supernatural".
At the end of the day though, the most beautiful thing is that one may apply these concepts to one's own benefit and growth regardless of belief, as long as one is able to connect the story to his own and his own perception of humanity's own story.
I couldn't have said it better.
To be clear, your beliefs
are batshit crazy. But no worries, everyone elses are too.
That being said, it's pretty commonly [believed] in certain circles that humanity has deviated from our original "holy" / "pure" / "divine" genetic blueprint due to genetic manipulation by otherworldly entities, both physical and metaphysical. Our original place as divine creators, co-creating with universe/Sophianic Dream, tainted by the introduction of foreign genetics in our DNA and tampering with of the energy/consciousness of Earth/Gaia as a whole. Leading both to the past 10,000-12,000 years of human violence, aggression, and dis-ease and disharmony of the planet's energies and overall state as well.
So can I assume you differ from the classic viewpoint of gnosticism that the creation of humans was a tragic mistake from the very beginning? Because as I understand it gnosticism usually holds the view that all matter is inherently bad, the world we live in and even our very own bodies and that the 'problem' can only be solved by leaving the material world completely behind and rejoining the realm of spirit. Are you saying the 'problem' arose within historical time and could therefore be solved within it? On the other hand you did say later, that you don't think that humanity ever was a perfect "beacon of light", which doesn't quite seem to fit in with this.
One problem that I have with a lot of religious/spiritual traditions is this disregard or even disdain for the physical world, especially the body. It is quite understandable that people who lived thousands of years ago without the advantages of modern medicine (and simple hygiene) viewed the body as a source of suffering above all else and just couldn't wait to leave it behind. But our relative comfort today (for a minority of the world population at least) gives us reason to be much more ambitious than our ancestors. For a long time it was pretty standard for religions to view suffering and poverty as unchangeble because it must have been put in place by some kind of authority. It is a very recent historical development that people realized you can actually reduce poverty and suffering by social reforms. Christianity for example always encouraged charity, but was never really about ending poverty. After all if you want to be charitable then there
has to be some poor guy.
I think no "heaven" we could ever "ascend to" would be as beautiful as the "heaven" that we might be able to create for ourselves here on earth. It would be a paradise that we have
truly earned because we have learned from out mistakes. I struggle with the same problem as swilow (I suppose) what on earth (or elsewhere

) could only ever justify all the pain and suffering that is happening and has happened in the past. And I find the answers "Jesus saved you and you go to heaven, so it's ok." and "You are God/Brahman and it was all just an illusion, so it's ok." both equally unappealing. As long as that suffering
seems real to somebody it is "real" enough to be a concern. After all this horror that humans had to go through (and I'm from Germany...) the only thing that could ever make 'it' worth it IMHO is if one day people can look back and say, humanity has truly learned from that and has never let it happen again.
Also I strongly dislike the whole "there was once a perfect time, but then something bad happened and ever since there is this evil influence" theme. It seems to me that saying that gives the idea that to make the world better all you need is to eliminate that evil influence and suddenly everythings perfect. I don't think it works that way. You don't make the world better by subtracting something bad, but by adding something good.
DNA manipulation though? Come on :D Are you basing that on Zecharia Sitchin? I don't know that much about mesopotamia, but even I know that Inanna/Ishtar was a deity and a pretty important one at that. He seems to have entirely missed that.