stupotmc
Greenlighter
Only if you don't mind losing limbs regularly and want to die very soon.
Only if you don't mind losing limbs regularly and want to die very soon.
That's very trueI'm only playing Devil's advocate here.
There are families of hundreds of thousands of people who died from those other drugs that would maybe think they are just as bad.
PS-- Also I think that if people had access to good drugs, shit like crocodil would disappear.
No.So are there any drugs you think should not be decriminalised. ?
I'm only playing Devil's advocate here.
There are families of hundreds of thousands of people who died from those other drugs that would maybe think they are just as bad.
PS-- Also I think that if people had access to good drugs, shit like krocodil would disappear.
Again, I think all drugs should be legal for adults to use in private.
I have never, in my 64 years on this planet, ever met someone who chooses not to do drugs because they are illegal.
I am not meaning to be argumentative. Aren't all drugs used in privacy. People don't generally sit in a public square and shoot. The point with me is the misuse and misinformed involved in recovery medicines. A lotta people think being in a program will stop them chasing but it's the opposite in my country and once you're on a opiate blacklist you can't even receive them in palative care. Maintenance should be available at every chemist without prescriptionAgain, I think all drugs should be legal for adults to use in private.
I have never, in my 64 years on this planet, ever met someone who chooses not to do drugs because they are illegal.
Wrong.Decriminalisation takes age restriction and resale into account. Legalisation doesn't bud.
That's exactly my point. Decriminalised drugs would be for adultsWrong.
A 10-yr-old cannot purchase alcohol, for instance.
"Bud", you have this backwards. Without legalisation there is no legal framework to control the supply. It seems like you contradicted yourself about this immediately anyway though with your acknowledgement of alcohol's legal status.Decriminalisation takes age restriction and resale into account. Legalisation doesn't bud
I have never referred to myself as a Meth head. I've tried but do not use regularly and in regards to homicide it was in reply to a post by to a post by YOU. I'm afraid we shall have to disagree. I think what you would like will not happen in my lifetime."Bud", you have this backwards. Without legalisation there is no legal framework to control the supply. It seems like you contradicted yourself about this immediately anyway though with your acknowledgement of alcohol's legal status.
Yes decriminalisation will almost certainly have to come first but it is a half measure that acknowledges that outright prohibition is not working while still attempting to maintain a "partial prohibition" which will have all the same problems (even if, ideally, lesser in magnitude). Yes decriminalisation is better than nothing but legalisation has to be the end goal or decriminalisation is just a nonsensical idea.
Regarding homicide, I'm not 100% sure what point you're actually making here but you seem to be advocating for some kind of vengeance based justice system, you're saying the family of someone who has just been killed by someone else are going to be best equipped psychologically to make an objective rational assessment on whether or not the person who killed their family member should be executed?
No I'm not saying users cannot decide things, I'm saying that someone who you yourself identify as a "meth head" and who they themselves confesses that despite continuing to use meth, they have such a negative perception of how it's affected their lives that they think meth should be completely illegal (as it already is, but, more illegal, I guess?) even though that would make them more of a criminal in the eyes of the state than they already are and certainly would not improve their lives... is probably not someone thinking rationally about this topic.
I've always believed the most relevant opinion makers are the one's who have walked the path. No matter what situation. Jury selection does not discriminate against life experience. Nor should society exclude the passionate. I don't advocate the death penalty ffs , there are too many innocents on death row but after a long time in gaol I do think I have more say than others about the rights of inmates. Familiarity doesn't always breed contempt and I think you over simplify and over complicate all at once.I have never referred to myself as a Meth head. I've tried but do not use regularly and in regards to homicide it was in reply to a post by to a post by YOU. I'm afraid we shall have to disagree. I think what you would like will not happen in my lifetime.![]()
Maybe 20 years ago, but I think its too late now. People are addicted to fentanyl, thats the new realty, they don't want heroin, its not strong enough.If heroin were legal, fentanyl would go away.
I've always believed the most relevant opinion makers are the one's who have walked the path. No matter what situation. Jury selection does not discriminate against life experience. Nor should society exclude the passionate. I don't advocate the death penalty ffs , there are too many innocents on death row but after a long time in gaol I do think I have more say than others about the rights of inmates. Familiarity doesn't always breed contempt and I think you over simplify and over complicate all at once.
Maybe 20 years ago, but I think its too late now. People are addicted to fentanyl, thats the new realty, they don't want heroin, its not strong enough.
It is strong enough . It's just been cut to shit. Mg to mg probably still not as strong as fent, but it will f.u.uMaybe 20 years ago, but I think its too late now. People are addicted to fentanyl, thats the new realty, they don't want heroin, its not strong enough.
My bad, I mistook you for the OP with the "meth head" thing. I wasn't referring to you as being the meth addict though, I was talking about the person mentioned in the topic title.I have never referred to myself as a Meth head. I've tried but do not use regularly and in regards to homicide it was in reply to a post by to a post by YOU. I'm afraid we shall have to disagree. I think what you would like will not happen in my lifetime.![]()