Chaotic Action Man
Bluelighter
i just responded to a poem posted by jeebus13;
here
and as i do critique some poems here i wanted to know your opinion, what constitutes a good critique vs one that has crossed the line. i would not want to upset people EVER through critiquing a poem. the only reason i do so is to make whomever a better writer. i would also hope the same applies to me, as i have recieved some critiques of my poems that caused me to look at them in a way i otherwise would have not. i came out of that a better writer.
this question i guess serves more as a guidline for responders. obviously attacks on a person or their writting maliciously is a no no (rightly so), but when does a critique turn from being constructive and benificial, to one of being harmful and negative?
please note i wrote this moments after responding to the other thread, and the idea just poped into mind. so i thought i would ask.
here
and as i do critique some poems here i wanted to know your opinion, what constitutes a good critique vs one that has crossed the line. i would not want to upset people EVER through critiquing a poem. the only reason i do so is to make whomever a better writer. i would also hope the same applies to me, as i have recieved some critiques of my poems that caused me to look at them in a way i otherwise would have not. i came out of that a better writer.
this question i guess serves more as a guidline for responders. obviously attacks on a person or their writting maliciously is a no no (rightly so), but when does a critique turn from being constructive and benificial, to one of being harmful and negative?
please note i wrote this moments after responding to the other thread, and the idea just poped into mind. so i thought i would ask.
