the different in my mind is if the dependence is having net positive or net negative affects on your life.
Perceived negative or positive effects (ie do you feel your addiction is worth the cost / benefit trade-off or no), doesn't determine addiction.
The deciding factor is whether or not you think you can live without your drug of choice.
I'd think one can hate stims but still be addicted.
Then that's an imperfect analysis. NOBODY gets addicted to a thing they do not LIKE.
If you press struggling addicts trying to give up as to their reasons WHY, it is invariably some kind of realization of the COST. As in, the detrimental legal, social, financial, physical or mental consequences of their use.
Such individuals will frequently cite things such as, "my doctor told me to stop or I will need a liver transplant", "my wife threatened to divorce me if I carry on", "I'm about to bankrupt myself",
"I owe it to myself / my family / God / society to get clean", "I just NEED to stop" etc etc.
It is ALWAYS about what-is-gonna-happen, or
"I feel guilty", or even just "I hate the state I got myself into".
ALL of these are real reasons for giving up, but NONE of them amount to actually WANTING to give up, or actually hating the drug.
What people in this situation hate is the personal cost of their drug use. If they hated the effects of the drug itself THEY WOULD NOT KEEP TAKING IT.
Change the parameter of the question for this specific demographic (the ones who say they want to stop but apparently 'cannot' stop to their distress), and the answers change.
Every single time I re-phrased the basic 'do you want to stop' or 'why do you want to stop' with, 'if there were magically ZERO negative impacts from your use, no health risk, no persecution by the law, no social stigma, no insecure black market with inflated prices, would you still want to use', the answer was basically 'hell yeah'.
No, you absolutely DO NOT 'hate stims' if you keep on taking them.
You enjoy their effects, just not the associated consequences.
some drugs are more physical (opioids), some more psychological (amphetamines).
opioids are physically addictive, ie dependence-forming, correct.
But most opioid addicts use for psychological reasons. The dependency is merely a compounding factor.
Again I think it boils down to is this doing more good than harm.
Again, this consideration doesn't differentiate addiction from non-addiction. It differentiates functional (and in many cases consciously willing) addiction from dysfunctional maladapted compulsion.