Hi all, I'm currently working towards trying to achieve good news, in spite of how far off it seems:
Yes, the systematic injustice seems insurmountable
Yes, severe paliperidone syndrome appears all but irreversible, unbearable and untreatable.
Yet, I'm taking some important steps in the right direction towards a few causes near and dear to my heart, i.e. issues central to my suffering and related directly and indirectly to some of our experiences.
First, I'm conducting treatment networking (looking for the cure), that is, networking to try and find doctors and psychiatrists who may have the knowledge and insight to help alleviate and treat this paliperidone syndrome. As I've said before, my conventional insurance doctors and psychiatrists have known and still know nothing about this syndrome (nor did they warn me) and I suspect this to be a widespread problem.
Second, I'm exploring what my (and our) options are for legal actions and remedies: what the outlook is, how much scientific and robust data and evidence we might have to have, statutes of limitation, etc.
Third, I'm exploring actions that will advance our strategy and strength as a group. It's a combination of:
a. the prospect of forming alliances with sympathetic and loyal doctors, psychiatrists and researches, individuals of various walks of life with power and influence, and independent, investigative and mainstream media.
b. protecting and collecting the evidence, data and testimony of ourselves and others who have suffered these severe adverse effects, with methods, warehousing, systems, databasing, etc. beyond the reach and corruption of those within psychiatry, medicine, and pharma, and those without it, who would unjustly, falsely and maliciously seek to damage our cause, discredit it, and cheat us, defame us, intimidate us, repress us, divide, scatter and conquer us, etc.
so that all our voices may ultimately be heard.
Fourth, I'm investigating remedies to the issue and trauma of misdiagnosis. It's a common and traumatic frustration and problem. I'm trying to see if there are legal remedies for misdiagnosis. At the very least, we need to hold the profession to much more honest, good faith and stringent and consistent adherence to diagnostic standards. In my experience, psychiatrists all over the spectrum,
from the antagonistic government ones prone to sadistic abuse of power and flagrant law-breaking and outright lying (yes, I have personal experience and the wounds never healed... indeed I looked the Devil in the eye)
to the conventional insurance ones,
play fast and loose with diagnosing psychiatric and particularly psychotic or other "abnormal psychology" mental disorders.
When I consider my own experience, I've experienced a spectrum of misdiagnosis (from most severe to least severe):
a. (forgive me for the excess of words here, I did not intend to share so much but once I got going, I felt it was necessary to share these worries and contextualize them in the wider issues of society)
In the most severe case, a rogue (sadistic and corrupt) psychiatrist who worked for a sadistic and corrupt D.A., many years ago (2010-2011), conducted an evaluation, 30m-60m, with his budding doctor son in the room as a witness (to the father's evil, no shame on his part). I told my story and complained about the treatment I had received at a psych ward (3-day emergency commitment). For instance, I had my medical privacy, photographic privacy (they surreptitiously and without my permission took an inflammatory, unflattering photo of me for distribution purposes) and my procedural rights clearly and grossly violated. He must have spent all of fifteen minutes typing up his report on me and after I received it a few days later, I was in for the shock of my life and immediately wished I had recorded the conversation via tech I easily possessed at the time. I had an instinct to do it before hand but I decided not to. I maintain I have never had delusions nor hallucinations. This guy absolutely made up the most egregious lies about me and about what he claimed I said. He claimed that I claimed to him that I was hearing voices, special messages in the radio and the tv, etc. I swear on all that is holy I never even said anything remotely close to that, nor even mentioned radio or tv at all. I was a Communicative Disorders major at the time, which my University has a specialty for: it's speech, language and hearing. The guy, in a deliberate insidious twist of words, claimed I told him my major was "communicative disordering," not only insulting my major and the entire discipline, but suggesting I took relish in truly crazy and disorganized speech. It's been a long time since then and I think the DSM has changed their criteria for such things, as I forget the exact terms, but there were canonical examples of truly crazy speech, where there is no grammatical structure, syntax, etc. or coherence whatsoever. But I definitely never committed those nor met those requirements. He said I was an extreme danger (something nobody else voiced or agreed with at all) and that I was paranoid, too, which I was not. (i.e. true paranoia, back in the older days of DSM, had strict requirements--making valid criticism of a psych ward, of the psychiatric profession and of having ones' rights violated is NOT even remotely canonical diagnostic paranoia. But one can imagine how false trumped up charges can be used to immediately suppress any dissent or criticism). It occurred to me, then, how a rogue psychiatrist in a matter of minutes, without any oversight or accountability, could lie and immediately influence a judge or a court of law--who lack expertise on psychiatry--bypassing due process, bypassing defendant testimony or the ability to even contest the report/diagnosis. I still believe such rogue psychiatrists are a great and continual threat to our nation, our law, our Western traditions of the social contract, fairness, separation of powers, rights, you name it. We may be looking at a future where certain Western societies and maybe all societies become like Rome in its waning years: lobbying and interest groups corrupting the imperial capital, bread and circuses and distractions, armies fighting against each other and ravaging the empire in civil war, innocent Christians slaughtered in human sacrifice and vulgar entertainment, chaos and anarchy, etc. We may be looking at a future where our professions and institutions, the pillars of our society, run amok in corruption and wrongdoing, along with bad powerful corporate actors and unscrupulous power-wielders. Psychiatry may be the weapon of the future utilized by any interest group, organization or power to crush dissent, destroy free speech and artistic expression, discredit truth and fairness, etc, and figure into a dystopian totalitarian or oligarchic future. Anyway, back to this rogue psychiatrist. I later found out that this psychiatrist had a perfect track record of getting every one of his victims (his opponents, meaning all the defendants) involuntarily committed for an extended period of time. A perfect record of corruption, like a devilish version of the Devil's Advocate! He did not succeed with me, thankfully. This rogue psychiatrist diagnosed me with paranoid schizophrenia.
b. the psychiatrist who first prescribed paliperidone to me in July 2021 said I had schizophrenia.
c. the psychiatrist I saw from October 2021 to September 2022 believed I had schizoaffective disorder but made no conclusive decision
d. a psychiatrist who saw me in the psych ward in 2010 said I had a temporary psychotic episode, and I was discharged from the ward with psychotic disorder not specified (from other psychs in the ward).
Looking specifically at the DSM-V, but also the DSM at the time (2010), it's clear I did not meet the criteria for any single one of those disorders on the entire spectrum. The most accurate thing one could say, if I had a mental disorder at all, was that
I had a temporary mental disorder with strange behavior and, in my recent June 2021 time, also irritability.
The DSM-V lists four criteria for Schizophrenia:
Hallucinations
Delusions
grossly disorganized or catatonic behavior
negative (psychotic symptoms)
as well as the requirement that it affect one's life and continue for an extended period of time.
Psychiatrists cannot play loose with these! There is a canonical standard for them. I never ever had any of these at any time.
Schizoaffective disorder is the same but includes a mood disorder like depression, bipolar episodes, etc. I never had any of those previous criteria and never experienced any depression, etc. even near to the time when I was having strange behavior and irritability. My strange behavior and irritability never lasted any longer than what could be considered well within the cutoff for a "temporary/brief psychotic episode," and upon further and rigorous inspection, my strange behavior and irritability, though problematic and arguably a mental health disorder, could not have been considered to be canonical psychotic symptoms. My only impaired perception in June 2021 was a simple lapse in memory--I forgot that four years prior I had moved my paternal grandparents' photos, and later I wrongly blamed my Mom.
These psychiatrists all played fast and loose. With what I told them and with what information was available about me, they could never have legitimately checked off any of these criteria and reached any of these diagnoses. The problem is often times political and not scientific/fair and legal. If you disagree with a diagnosis, you could be seen as being noncompliant, totally rejecting care/voluntary care, lacking self-awareness, delusional, etc. Of course those would be fast and loose, inaccurate characterizations. A patient may simply want a more fair and scientific/legal diagnosis, to reduce harm. Our legal system includes the adversarial model, which will mean, inevitably, that government, the public office and trust, will often be vicious and excessive. Unfortunately, this invites a certain type of person--precisely the type of people we don't want in power, in positions of public office and trust, running institutions that our the pillars/foundations of our society--that is, people who love power, like to abuse it, and like to abuse others (sociopaths and psychopaths, in other words). When faced with the authorities unfairly and excessively coming after individuals, the convenient option is often to comply with excessive treatment and excessive diagnoses, to avoid inflaming said authorities. However, this is not truth, this is not medicine, and this is not fair. Additionally, patients are very much of sound mind and justified in wanting to avoid excessive medication and excessive inaccurate diagnoses, because we know the truth about how dangerous antipsychotic medications are. If there were truly safe and effective antipsychotics, patients would be much less reticient to take them.
Fifth, I'm making efforts to address injustices in Emergency Detention.
I've experienced a 72-hour (involuntary) emergency detention twice in my life: March 2010 and July 2021. Thankfully, I've managed to avoid being involuntarily committed for any longer period. As I mentioned just before, my first time in a psych ward was miserable: I had my medical privacy, photographic privacy (they surreptitiously and without my permission took an inflammatory, unflattering photo of me for distribution purposes) and my procedural rights clearly and grossly violated. The second time, I believe the authorities broke the law and procedure regarding Emergency Detention as mandated, with strict and necessary conditions, under my region's law, the law of the land in my region. I was shocked to recently discover that at least four (and counting) regional police and government legal agencies, as well as a regional law firm, all have an incorrect understanding of the requirements for Emergency Detention. Our region's law stipulates three conditions that all have to be met, and the third condition is not mentioned by any of the five. This certainly means that many area police departments and authorities are playing fast and loose with Emergency Detention criteria. I realize that also, in my case in June 2021, the police did not meet the third condition when carrying out an Emergency Detention on me. I'm exploring right now whether there are legal remedies for their misconduct and breaking of the law. The ultimate goal is to curb their excesses, protect the rights of citizens and achieve justice and reform, not only for the benefit of citizens into the future but for the satisfaction of those who have suffered from the excesses, misconduct and evils often present in Emergency Detentions and involuntary commitments. These evils and misconduct have received very little attention from anyone, but there are a few good lawyers out there who have indeed labored in this specific cause of fighting against wrongdoing in Emergency detentions and involuntary commitments.
Sixth, in the background, is the goal to make psychiatry safer, more accountable, more responsible and hold them to high traditional medical standards. As much as mental health issues are a growing issue for our societies, so also is the devastating, sometimes irreversible and life-destroying consequences of adverse reactions to depression medications and, specifically, antipsychotics. Real world patient data and adverse reactions are not being collected, considered nor reported. Many people suffer from terrible experiences with incompetent and/or callous psychiatrists. Many are misdiagnosed, many have their rights violated, many have no help to turn to. Clearly, if classical high values of the medical profession, like caring and sifting and investigating, were shared by most of the psychiatric profession (as should be the way), then psychiatrists in the community of their own accord would be databasing/submitting to databases the outcomes of their patients in the real world (rather than just a pre-drug approval sample size study extrapolated to the wider population), that is, they would demonstrate they care about adverse reactions, new previously unknown adverse reactions and truly advancing the treatment of all diseases and conditions. There are repeated patterns of misconduct and incompetence in psychiatry that must be addressed. Lack of safety is endemic to depression medications and, most severely, antipsychotic medications. The pharmaceutical companies behind these medications have already been proven to have repeated patterns of misconduct: in influencing, tampering with and misrepresenting safety and efficacy studies and their conclusions, in inappropriate marketing, in causing harm and damage, in their monetary and political influence on regular practice psychiatrists, on researchers, in academia and professional schools, in professional organizations and in concealing and repressing dissent and fair, truthful criticism. Biased influences on medicine undermine its integrity. If we are to advance medicine and safety, in general and psychiatry and antipsychotics, specifically, then not only must we promote sharing and reporting of information and adverse effects but we must protect these good faith measures from being corrupted or hijacked by biased powerful interests. If they have a pattern of misconduct, including with pre-approval research studies, then when they get a chance, they will very likely collect and twist data from real world patients too and interfere with others collecting such data, to suit their own interests. That's why we need public awareness and powerful allies. These, along with legal actions and perhaps, I suggest, a semi-governmental semi-civilian-civic Oversight Committee, will help hold psychiatry and big pharma accountable.
In conclusion, Justice can be done for all these issues, with proper alliances and power moves and remedies, diligent evidence and record-keeping, teamwork amongst victims, public awareness and tireless advocacy.
I'm trying to use myself as a vehicle for positive change, professional and institutional reform, public welfare, fairness and justice.