Colombian Supreme Court Rules That Drug Possession Is Not A Crime

Tchort

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
2,390
StopTheDrugWar.com

Drug War Chronicle

09/11/2009


Upholding a 1994 ruling from the country's Constitutional Court, Colombia's Supreme Court has ruled that possession of illegal drugs for personal use is not a crime. The ruling came in the case of Ancizar Jaramillo Quintero, who had been arrested, convicted, and imprisoned for the possession of 1.3 grams of cocaine. The court threw out his conviction in July and ordered his immediate release.

In its opinion in the case (available here in Spanish), the court held that drug addiction is a disease, not a vice, and should be treated accordingly. Drug use "generates in a person problems of addiction and slavery that turn one into a sick, compulsive individual deserving of therapeutic medical treatment instead of a punishment," the judges said.

The court also invoked a principal that could be likened to "no harm, no foul." "In the exercise of his personal and private rights, the accused did not harm others," so his conduct "cannot be the object of any punishment," the opinion stated.

Although the Colombian Constitutional Court ruled that possession of small amounts of drugs for personal use was not a prosecutable offense, the government of President Alvaro Uribe is trying to undo that decision with a constitutional amendment. It has already been approved by the lower house and is now before the Colombian Senate.

If the Senate approves the measure, it will mean that the Colombian government is out of step not only with its own judiciary, but increasingly, with the rest of Latin America. Mexico decriminalized drug possession last month, and a few days later, the Argentine Supreme Court issued a decision decriminalizing marijuana possession on the spot and calling into question the criminalization of possession of any drug for personal use. Brazil, Ecuador, and Uruguay are headed down similar paths.

http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/600/colombia_supreme_court_drug_possession_not_crime
 
Drug use "generates in a person problems of addiction and slavery that turn one into a sick, compulsive individual deserving of therapeutic medical treatment instead of a punishment," the judges said.

And this is what scares me about making drug use a medical issue, the right to use drugs gets forgotton and we're all sick, compulsive slaves. Its not far to supporting drug prohibition on public health grounds, and seeing addicts as sick people spreading disease to healthy people(drugs and drug culture).

Right back where we started.
 
The court also invoked a principal that could be likened to "no harm, no foul." "In the exercise of his personal and private rights, the accused did not harm others," so his conduct "cannot be the object of any punishment," the opinion stated.
No victim, no crime. The court should have simply stopped after this statement. I am afraid that the "addiction and slavery" argument could be used to involuntarily commit people to mental asylums for treatment. But at least Colombia has a Constitution that its judges respect.
 
No victim, no crime. The court should have simply stopped after this statement. I am afraid that the "addiction and slavery" argument could be used to involuntarily commit people to mental asylums for treatment. But at least Colombia has a Constitution that its judges respect.

Unfortunately, "no victim, no crime" is not a doctrine we follow too closely in the U.S. Our criminal system has ample precedent twisting and pulling on the legal elements of "victimhood" and "harm" until they lie empty and lifeless on the floor. Yes, by having an eighth in your drawer, you are significantly harming all of society. Amazing how that can happen when the burden of proof is so high by default in most every facet of the law.

Some "conduct crimes" (crimes where you haven't harmed anybody but, theoretically, your behavior could, such as DUIs and possession of burglary materials) might be defensible as culpable. Possession of controlled substances, though, is not.
 
Top